Buffalo River Watershed Alliance

Log in

PCE Commission Article Mar. 23, 2013

24 Mar 2013 7:42 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)
Publication:Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette; Date:Mar 23, 2013; Section:Northwest Arkansas; Page Number:9


Pollution panel: Improve notices
Hog-farm permit in Buffalo River watershed prompts order
RYAN MCGEENEY ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE



Commissioners with the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission ordered Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Director Teresa Marks on Friday to return in April with a plan to improve public notification of pending permits.

The department’s decision to approve a permit for a 6,500-animal hog farm inside the Buffalo National River watershed has drawn criticism from advocates for the Buffalo National River.

The directive, issued by commission Chairman Stan Jorgensen, came after two hours of public comment concerning a confined animal feeding operations general permit that the Environmental Quality Department issued to C&H Farms in Mount Judea. Most of those protesting the permit addressed the potential dangers to the national river and the failure of the department to adequately notify the public that such a permit was under consideration.

At Friday’s meeting, Debbie Doss, conservation chairman for the Arkansas Canoe Club, summarized the complaints of about a dozen others, each of whom cited being taken by surprise by the issuance of the permit, despite being regularly engaged in public-policy participation.

“If no one here knows what’s going on, there’s something wrong with the notification process,” Doss said.

In 2010, the Environmental Quality Department began developing what is known as the “confined animal feeding operations general permit” under the guidelines of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems program authorized by the federal Clean Water Act. The new permit requires operators to establish extensive retaining systems for animal waste and other byproducts, but also allows operators to discharge waste from animal confinement areas into public waterways in the event of extraordinary rainfall.

Between Feb. 11 and March 11, 2011, the department held six public-comment sessions around the state, during which comments from more than a dozen individuals, organizations and corporations were recorded. However, the review process concerned only the new confined animal feeding operations permit and had nothing to do with specific operations such as C&H Farms. The Arkansas confined animal feeding operations general permit became effective Nov. 1, 2011.

C&H Farms was the first entity to apply for the new permit. Owners of the 670-acre farm, which is along the banks of Big Creek, a major tributary of the Buffalo River, completed a notice of intent to apply for the general permit in June 2012. While the notice of intent was posted on the Environmental Quality Department’s website, no further efforts were made to contact area residents or agencies about the permit application.

Interested parties can sign up to receive e-mail notifications from the department when it receives “notice of intent” applications for several kinds of permits, including permits for hazardous waste, solid waste and wastewater. According to department spokesman Katherine Benenati, an e-mail based mailing list that distributes information on applications for water permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems program was added to the site Feb. 19.

In August, the department issued the state’s first confined animal feeding operations general permit to C&H Farms, having received no public comment regarding the proposal.

Public outcry from environmental organizations and business owners who derive their income from tourism along the Buffalo National River began to mount after Kevin Cheri, superintendent of the river, expressed concern to Marks in a letter dated Dec. 20 over the National Park Service not being consulted during the permitting process for C&H Farms.

Marks responded to Cheri’s letter by explaining the history and process of creating the confined animal feeding operations general permit, rather than addressing specific information related to C&H Farms.

Marks told the commission Friday that during the process of gathering public comment on the state’s new general permit, administrators had no way of foreseeing an operation like C&H Farms.

“The problem is, nobody knew at that time that a [confined animal feeding operation] was going to go into the Buffalo River watershed,” Marks said.

“When that came out, that went on our website,” Marks said, referring to the notice regarding C&H Farms. “And that’s what folks are saying they didn’t get. They feel that that was wrong, and I understand what they’re saying.”

Marks said she felt that despite public objections, greater public notice of the C&H Farms permit would not have changed the department’s decision to approve the permit.

“If you don’t want anything going into the Buffalo River watershed, then you need to look at how you can prevent discharges into the Buffalo River watershed. It’s that kind of issue. It’s not a notice issue,” Marks said. “As long as it’s legal for us to permit there, I don’t know how we would have denied this permit based upon what I have heard, because it’s a permitable facility under current law.”

Jorgensen told Marks to formulate a new approach to notifying the public to permit applications for presentation at the commission’s April 15 meeting.

“This process doesn’t work, not well,” Jorgensen said. “In this situation, for sure.”

After the meeting adjourned, Marks said a new process would likely concentrate on alerting county judges on a monthly basis to all new notices of intent that the department receives for affected counties.

Comments

  • 24 Mar 2013 6:36 PM | Anonymous
    Notice to Counties (County Judges) is not enough. Newton County officials were supportive of this project because of an expected large increase in the County's tax base. Polluting corporations preying on poor Counties could have a field day in this State.
    Link  •  Reply
    • 24 Mar 2013 9:31 PM | Anonymous
      Of course Teresa Marks would say that the outcome would be the same even with public notice. The truth is ADEQ is embarrassed by this mistake because they are getting considerable heat from the public. If this outcry had come during the comment period they would not have been able to ignore it. The families involved in this hog factory are victims of sweet talking corporate advance men. The history of this type of operation is one where the farmer never really gets out of debt and the corporation takes all the profits. Surrounding land values drop and people move away if they can.

      We need to keep the heat on. If any of you wish to write to Teresa Marks and inform her that notification of county judges is not enough here is the phone number and email Teresa Marks, Director marks@adeq.state.ar.us (501) 682-0959

      Keep up the pressure.
      Link  •  Reply
  • 25 Mar 2013 7:47 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)
    A conversation on 3/23 with John Bailey, ADEQ Water Div.confirmed that this statement was NOT accurate: "Jorgensen told Marks to formulate a new approach to notifying the public to permit applications for presentation at the commission’s April 15 meeting." He said there were no such instructions were given to Marks.
    Link  •  Reply
  • 27 Mar 2013 4:00 PM | Anonymous
    Marks quote: It’s not a notice issue,” Marks said. “As long as it’s legal for us to permit there, I don’t know how we would have denied this permit based upon what I have heard, because it’s a permitable facility under current law.”

    She's right--so how do we go about insuring that CAFO discharges are illegal/non-permitable?
    Surely other National Scenic Rivers have gone down this path--do we need to consult with RFK, Jr. for instance?
    I remember his visit to the UofA a few years back and how he spoke forcefully about Tyson's pollution of Arkansas waterways.
    Consider that a single FtSmith resident's letter to Erin Brokovitch has resulted in her firm taking up their case against a corporate polluter of the ground water there. Perhaps a resident of MtJudea could appeal to RFK. Why not try it...
    Link  •  Reply

Buffalo River Watershed Alliance is a non profit 501(c)(3) organization

Copyright @ 2019


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software