Buffalo River Watershed Alliance
Arkansas Times
It’s time for a fight: Ozarkers bite back at town hall over Buffalo River proposal
by Jared Phillips
Last night in Jasper, Ozarkers finally got to have their say, though the folks who needed to hear what was said couldn’t be bothered to come.
Nearly 1,200 angry people packed the high school cafeteria in Jasper on Thursday to protest proposed changes to the Buffalo National River and the broader region. The anger was palpable — and it should be. Once again, hill folks are being ignored in discussions about their fate. And this time they’re ready for the fight.
Locals first heard about plans to change the Buffalo’s designation from a national river to a “national park preserve” when Runway Group, a Northwest Arkansas investment company backed by third-generation Walmart heirs Tom Walton and Steuart Walton, began surveying residents in the Buffalo River area about the proposal. First Gentleman Bryan Sanders, the governor’s husband, has been involved in the hush-hush planning process, according to state legislators.
During Thursday’s meeting, the crowd listened as speakers cleared up confusion surrounding the survey and what the designation change would mean. As former Newton County resident Wendy Finn outlined just how skewed the Runway Group survey was, the room erupted in outrage and laughter. Misty Langdon, the meeting’s organizer, explained what the increase in tourism would mean for daily life in the impacted counties. The real moments of impact were when local Billy Bell and state Sen. Bryan King outlined how hard it was to get a straight answer from the Waltons and Bryan Sanders. When they and others (including myself) pointed out that nobody impacted was at the table but should be, the cafeteria erupted in angry shouts and clapping.
This anger makes sense. For the last several generations, residents haven’t had a seat at the table when big changes have come to the Ozarks. Agriculture regulations, zoning laws, redistricting, economic development, and the creation of state and national reserves and parks all occur without any meaningful input from local communities most directly impacted. The proposed redesignation of the Buffalo is more of the same. And it’s part of a broader pattern by Runway Group, the Walton family and some politicians in Little Rock to remove Ozarkers from the Ozarks.
What does that look like? Well, it starts slow. A museum was built in 2011, proclaiming the arrival of culture and arts into the region. Then came an effort to build not just a commuter bike trail, but to take over gravel roads and rocky hillsides with bikes that cost more than most people’s mortgages. From there, a rebranding effort appeared. No longer are we the Ozarks, we are “Oz,” full of exciting, crafted adventures by groups like 37 North, who are as out of place in the hills as the Walton boys are throwing hay bales. All of this has been supported by a gradual taking control of the land itself as thousands of acres throughout the region have been bought up by the Walton family and an ever-shifting landscape of LLCs and environmental nonprofits.
These kinds of activities have real consequences. As a historian, I spend a lot of time looking at the changes in North and Central Arkansas over the last 100 or so years. Of particular interest to me are the small towns and small farms that once populated our landscape. As a rule, that story is not a happy one. Farms fold and are lost. Families leave, schools close and towns shrink and fade. A vacuum is left, and where once the rhythm of Ozark life thrived, only outsiders interested in the next adventure are found.
Right now, nobody is being burned out or forced by the sheriff to leave, like when Beaver Lake or Bull Shoals Lake were built (or when the Buffalo River was nationalized). But if a family can’t afford their property taxes because absentee landowners and tourism drives property values sky high, what choice do they have? Sell to somebody and come out ahead, or watch the family farm sell on the courthouse steps.
For those who want to stay — like the folks in Jasper Thursday night —neither is a choice they want. It’s still removal, even if it pretends to offer a choice.
We’ve been overrun with progress, and it’s reweaving the very fabric of hill life. The changes of the last decade or so, though, cut deeper than the shifts of the past. Its masters assume we won’t question anything — that we’ll accept the bulldozers and the end of rural life and the loss of ourselves. Be quiet, take the money, things are good. After all, we’ve got festivals, bike trails, fancy places to eat. Culture has arrived in the hills. Don’t bite the hand, they say.
Last night it was clear, though, that this has gone far enough. People from across the Ozarks voiced their anger and support for pushing back against an idle class’s efforts to turn our homes into a playground for the rich.
Last night, the Ozarks decided to bite back.
AR Democrat Gazette
Runway Group of Bentonville has touted the success of New River Gorge National Park & Preserve in West Virginia as a model for the Buffalo National River.
Annual visitation at New River Gorge increased by 60% from 2020 to 2021, the first year after its designation changed from a national river to a national park and preserve.
But attendance at New River Gorge decreased by 5% in 2022, according to the National Park Service.
A flyer distributed by the Coalition for Buffalo River National Park Preserve didn't mention the visitation decrease at New River Gorge in 2022.
There are at least two reasons for the huge spike in visitors in 2021: It was the first year after the covid-19 pandemic began (visitation numbers decreased by 12% in 2020), and New River Gorge was in the spotlight as America's newest national park.
Still, the 2022 visitation number at New River Gorge is a 33% increase over the pre-pandemic number of visitors in 2019. (The Buffalo National River had a 1.5% decrease over the same time period.)
Roger Wilson, CEO of Adventures on the Gorge -- which has 128 cabins, 15 RV sites and 150 campsites on land bordering the West Virginia national park -- said the change has been a good one.
"I'm very happy," he said. "The little stores are seeing more business now. Little restaurants are opening. I think this is a long-term thing. It may take 15 or 20 years for the full effect of having a national park here."
New River Gorge is famous for its whitewater rafting. Canoeing is the main attraction on the slower-flowing Buffalo River.
Wilson was among a small group who got the change underway in West Virginia, first by getting the approval of U.S. senators and congressmen and the governor.
Runway Group has floated the idea of making a similar designation change for the Buffalo National River, but their strategy of approaching U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., first seems to have chafed some of the locals, who see the idea as drifting down from Washington, D.C., or over from Bentonville.
"I don't know how they went about it in West Virginia, but here in Arkansas it's going over about as well as a screen door in a submarine," said state Sen. Bryan King, R-Green Forest, whose Senate District 28 includes 34% of the Buffalo River watershed.
"If this was so well planned, then why are so many people upset?" said King. "I think they should have started locally down there and started visiting with them about it. Why would you not?"
King will be one of the speakers at a public town-hall meeting on the re-designation idea for the Buffalo National River that's scheduled for tonight in Jasper. More information can be found on the Remnants Project's Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/remnantsproject. Runway Group said it won't have a representative at the meeting.
The Buffalo National River -- which is administered by the National Park Service -- attracted 1.3 million visitors last year and contributed over $64.9 million in spending to "local gateway regions." The Buffalo National River became the first national river in the United States on March 1, 1972, according to the Encyclopedia of Arkansas. It is one of the few remaining free-flowing rivers in the lower 48 states.
Proponents say changing the Buffalo National River's designation to a national park and preserve would bring in more visitors and more federal funding for infrastructure, while preserving hunting and fishing access. That would translate, in theory, to more money for businesses and communities in the vicinity.
Opponents are concerned about overcrowding and the possibility of additional land-use restrictions.
Runway Group is a privately held company founded by Steuart and Tom Walton that invests in part in "outdoor recreation experiences." The Walton brothers are grandsons of Sam Walton, founder of Walmart Stores Inc.
On Wednesday, a spokesman said Runway Group remains a member of the Coalition for Buffalo River National Park Preserve. He didn't respond to a text message asking who other members of the coalition are.
"For more than a decade, we have invested resources throughout the state to expand access to the outdoors," Runway Group said in a statement posted Wednesday on its website at https://runwaynwa.com/statement-on-the-future-of-the-buffalo-national-river/.
"Our team develops unique experiences that benefit quality of life and create economic opportunities for our communities to thrive," the statement continued. "We believe a change in status is one idea that would provide needed infrastructure support to a growing number of tourists; would support the preservation of the river and its current boundaries; and would create new ways to benefit the surrounding communities."
Runway approached Westerman about the idea over a year ago.
"It was with all of that in mind when we approached Congressman Westerman in July 2022 to discuss an idea about the redesignation of the BNR to National Park Preserve," according to Runway. "We studied Preserve status because it's the only park status that can maintain hunting and other public recreation access."
Runway wanted Westerman's thoughts first because part of the Buffalo National River is within his Fourth Congressional District and because of his position on the House Natural Resources Committee, according to the company's statement.
Westerman became chairman of that committee in January. A bill to make the designation change would have to go through the Natural Resources Committee before going to the full House for a vote, then to the Senate, then to the president. But no such bill has been drafted.
"We're a long ways from me even writing a bill," Westerman told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette last week.
"Congressman Westerman made it clear to us that the idea needed support from various groups, state and local officials and the local community," according to Runway.
More conversations led to Runway's funding a poll that was conducted in September, according to the statement on its website. The poll included 412 voters from Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton, and Searcy counties.
According to the poll results, 64% of respondents would ask their congressman to vote for legislation to change the Buffalo's designation to that of a national park preserve.
An overwhelming majority of respondents said they didn't want the federal government to take any additional private land for the park and they didn't want their taxes to increase.
"Polling is something Runway has engaged in in the past to understand how people feel about certain topics before we advocate for an idea," the company said on its website. "We instructed the polling company to be transparent about who funded the study if asked."
King described it as a push poll, which is a poll in which the person asking questions attempts to influence the response.
"I don't think there's any question that it's a push poll," said King. "I think that's the result they wanted."
Runway said it got valuable information from the survey.
"We learned a lot from the survey, including where we have shared values with the community: Runway doesn't support the taking of private lands and doesn't support mining or drilling on the Buffalo River. We are in favor of maintaining public access to traditional forms of recreation, such as hunting. We were also looking at the success of West Virginia's New River Gorge, which recently celebrated $3.7B in federal funding since it was designated a National Park.
"A designation change for the Buffalo National River is not our decision to make, but we believe it's an idea worth exploring," according to Runway.
Regarding property purchased in the Madison County town of Kingston, near the Buffalo National River, Runway Group said in its online statement: "As part of a restoration effort, members of the Walton family acquired three historic buildings on the square in downtown Kingston, intending to update them and open their doors to the community. While we don't yet have a timeline for the opening, we will share more when we do."
The Madison County Record of Huntsville, which broke the story on Oct. 4 about the survey being conducted, reported that Walton family entities own thousands of acres of land near Kingston through a limited liability company.
New River Gorge National Park & Preserve consists of 7,021 acres at the heart of the gorge, spanned by the New River Gorge Bridge, and another 65,000 acres of the park that is a preserve on which hunting and fishing are permitted, according to the Encyclopedia of West Virginia.
Wilson said he couldn't put an estimate on how much his business has increased since the national park designation because of restrictions during the pandemic on things like how many people he could put on a bus to send them to the river.
Wilson said he hopes the national park status will help the town of Fayetteville, W.Va., population 2,887, by bringing in business and providing jobs for local kids.
Wilson said not much has really changed at the park, other than the influx of visitors.
"Basically, they changed the name on the sign, from a national river to a national park and preserve," he said. "That's the biggest change, other than the little bit of land that you can't hunt on."
Wilson said four or five public meetings were held before New River Gorge was designated as a national river and preserve.
"Other than the original fear of losing rights and property by really a small handful, a majorly of locals supported it and still do and see the benefit," he said.
Print Headline: W. Virginia gorge held as example for Buffalo
Democrat Gazette
by John Brummett | October 25, 2023 at 3:21 a.m.
Closed-door maneuvering at the rich and powerful levels to mess with the Buffalo National River has run into a mighty mite from the past.
It is a thing called a good community newspaper.
They have a dandy in Huntsville near the Buffalo River. It is the Madison County Record, with a circulation of 4,000 and a staff of five. Its publisher is Ellen Kreth, who once ran the Style section of this newspaper.
She and the Record copped a national award last year from the Nieman Foundation at Harvard. It was for articles revealing a cover-up by the local school board of sexual-abuse allegations against junior-high boys basketball players.
Stories like that are more easily told from a high-rise in Manhattan than the little newspaper office down the block in a small town.
Runners-up for the prize were other small community newspapers such as The Washington Post and the Miami Herald, the latter in partnership with the online Pulitzer winner called ProPublica.
This time, the little paper broke the news a couple of weeks ago that previously quiet efforts were afoot to get the Buffalo National River re-designated a national park preserve. The idea was to draw federal infrastructure money and more visitors ... and, if someone wanted, land excavation for minerals, which is allowed under certain conditions in a national park.
The paper nosed around on a flurry of land purchases in the nearby Huntsville area. It found information connecting some of those purchases to the Walton brothers, Steuart and Tom.
From that--indirectly--came revelations of quiet high-level interest in a Buffalo River redesignation by a mostly unidentified coalition called the Runway Group including those brothers.
The idea is that Newton County and surrounding environs could become a major resort or destination, which would be good for the rich and powerful and presumably good for the locals.
More cross-country vacationers will go to a national park--touted for beauty, hiking, camping and private-enterprise services and attractions nearby--than a national river that sounds like a place to put in a canoe if that happens to be your thing. A national river in West Virginia gained more than a half-million additional visitors from such a redesignation.
U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, whose sprawling low-population-density district extends from south Arkansas northward to parts of the Buffalo River, happens to be chairperson of a House committee on national parks and national preservation.
He was briefed by Runway Group advocates last year. He tells a reporter he chatted months ago about the idea with the governor, Sarah Sanders, who has made her husband the unofficial and unpaid czar of all Arkansas outdoors. He is a bicyclist, they say. And he has engaged in discussions with Runway.
Sometimes a national preserve's oversight can be federally delegated to a state. So ponder that little detail.
Westerman is quoted this morning in the Madison County Record--or at least I am reliably advised that he will be--as saying everyone is now in a "listening mode" on these previously private maneuverings.
That translates to "your newspaper exposed the thing and now the advocates need to put on the brakes while the locals berate us, and we try to mend fences and show them what is factual and good about the idea."
Money, that is, meaning what is good.
There seems to be some local sentiment that river and highway traffic is fine if not a little on the high side already. I am reminded of driving into Vermont from New Hampshire and coming up behind a pickup bearing a bumper sticker saying, "Welcome to Vermont. Now please leave."
There are several significant issues that would arise eventually in this matter. And that makes the first issue especially important. And that first issue is transparency.
A lack of transparency feeds low information, misinformation, fear, resentment, and anger--none of which needs much feeding these days.
So, before we get to those issues--and to the over-arching question of whether you want to preserve the Buffalo River area as it is or convert it to a more money-making operation--we need to attend to basic information.
Facts will not end low information, misinformation, fear, resentment, or anger. Some people just like those things. But facts still have currency, especially when introduced to a situation with few if any known facts.
It should be said that, while the newspaper indeed pushed out this issue, state Sen. Bryan King of Green Forest, who is emerging as quite the force for old-fashioned conservative populism--cowboy conservatism, I call it--has been sounding an alarm as well.
All of that has the makings of a fine debate. It pits the economically driven proponents against the legitimate citizen and preservationist concerns about having a rugged rural lifestyle of choice ruined because certain rich people and politicians want to make even more money, or have even more power, or enjoy a new playground, or all of the above.
Through it all, maybe the Madison County Record can cop another prize.
John Brummett, whose column appears regularly in the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, is a member of the Arkansas Writers' Hall of Fame. Email him at jbrummett@arkansasonline.com. Read his @johnbrummett feed on X, formerly Twitter.
Madison County Record
Buffalo River land tangled in crosscurrents
Preserve designation surfaced in July 2022
Part 2
In September, owners of Horseshoe Canyon, a dude ranch located near Jasper in
Newton County, announced after the 2023 season, they would be retiring, but
the “Ranch will continue to be open to the public, offering the same great
adventures and more. We are active in the transition taking place and are
incredibly excited about the future of HCR!”
Unconfirmed reports indicate Steuart and Tom Walton have made plans to
purchase Horseshoe Canyon. Owner Barry Johnson was on vacation and did not
respond to a request for comment.
Horseshoe Canyon’s season runs from March through November and the
property encompasses cabins and offers rock climbing, hiking, zip lining, archery
and horseback riding and floating the Buffalo National River.
Also in September, in an effort to gauge public opinion, the Runway Group hired
Selzer & Company, who polled 412 voters in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton
and Searcy counties about a change in land designation and produced a flyer
with the results.
“Polling is something Runway has engaged in in the past to understand how
people feel about certain topics before we advocate for an idea,” a statement
from the Runway Group said.
On Sept. 25, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information
Act request, Secretary of the Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism Shea
Lewis noted on a “To Do List” he needed to speak with “Teddy” regarding a
“Buffalo River update.”
Teddy Stewart is Bryan Sanders’ chief of staff.
That same “To Do List” included “assigning Buffalo River project to Katherine.”
Katherine Andrews is the Department of Tourism’s director of the Office of
Outdoor Recreation.
On Sept. 28, Lewis and Andrews exchanged emails regarding the development of
a “proposal related to Buffalo River area.”
Many of the documents tendered in response to the FOIA request have to do
with different projects pertaining to the river and do not mention specifically the
possibility of changing the public lands to a park preserve.
On Oct. 4, the public heard of the potential change to lands surrounding the
Buffalo National River when The Record published its story.
Citizens’ thoughts
Westerman said he’s hearing a mixture of reactions but most of the people
reaching out to his office are opposed.
“From my experience in Congress, when issues come up, it’s usually people who
are opposed to issues that reach out the strongest.”
King has remained opposed to any change and has been outspoken regarding
transparency around the issue, stating discussions needed to have started with
local officials and citizens.
Rep. Chad Puryear, R-Hindsville, said the prospect of changing the federal lands
“has brought a lot of speculation, emotion and concern to the otherwise quiet
region of Madison and Newton Counties.”
Puryear said, “Rural Arkansans have always been wary of trusting the
government and outsiders. This is especially true of the Newton County families
that are old enough to remember the sting of losing their family farms the last
time the government got involved with the Buffalo River.
“I did not have to do any polling to find my conclusion. As a 6th generation
Arkansas farmer whose family has lived and worked on the same land since
1887, I believe the good people of rural Arkansas do not want or need the advice
from the government or a special interest group to help them decide what is best
for their communities.”
Cowell lives within five to six miles of the Buffalo National River and near a
tributary that feeds into the river, “kind of right in the middle of the National
Forest.”
Cowell says the river can’t handle an increase in traffic and tourism. He said from
what he’s read he doesn’t believe the area would see an increase in
infrastructure funding.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, when everyone was getting outdoors, the crowds
were so large, “You couldn’t get within miles of the river at times,” Cowell said.
The crowds have remained.
“My little girl had soccer games in Jasper Saturday morning and you couldn’t find
anywhere to park,” he said. “It’s hard enough to get around as it is.”
Westerman said he sees pros and cons to increased tourism. He said owning a
business in the area and wanting more customers would be a pro, but increased
traffic could be a con.
“So all of those things, you’ve got to take into account,” he said.
Cowell said he’s worried about what changes a different land designation would
bring and is not happy with what he sees as secrecy and lack of transparency
surrounding the idea.
Because there’s no push for legislation at this point, Westerman said, “We’re
certainly not being secretive or hiding anything from anyone.”
If legislation is introduced, Westerman has thoughts about what would not be
included.
“So the park’s about 95,000 acres already and I would be opposed to expanding
the park boundary. I will be opposed to taking in private land. I would be
opposed to private landowners losing any of their current access and rights to
their property. I would be opposed if you restricted fishing or hunting,” he said.
Survey results
The survey polled people about trails for walking, for bicycling, about the area’s
natural beauty, property taxes, retail and service businesses as well as
restaurants and lodging. It also quizzed people on their satisfaction of having
access to the river for water sports, fishing and hunting.
It asked those polled if they were aware the Buffalo National River had a national
river designation and whether they thought it would be a good idea to turn the
public land around it into a national park and preserve. Sixty-one percent said it
was a good idea, 32% said it was a bad idea and 7% said they were unsure.
According to the Runway Group’s survey, if federal lands were changed to a park
preserve, changes would include improved roads and access to the river, paved
parking lots near trails, campsites and boat ramps, new public restrooms, new
walking and hiking trails and improvements to existing trails, more opportunities
for local businesses and more management to retain the natural habitat of native
trees, plants and wildlife.
The survey quizzed respondents on not designating land as a national park
preserve, including their thoughts on leaving things the way they are, designating
land sounding like big government, having too many visitors and too many new
businesses, having more fees and permits, changing the river’s character by
paving roads and installing new signage and seeing an increase in alcohol sales.
Even after the pointing out the “bad” points, the Runway Group’s survey said 63%
thought changing the land designation was a good idea, 34% said it was a bad
thing and 3% were unsure.
King said he expressed his frustration to Runway Group officials in last Friday’s
meeting that the poll “was not done in a way I felt was best to get an accurate
representation of how local people feel about the idea changing the Bu#alo
River.”
Even though Cowell feels a little better about the Runway Group retracting its
position, he’s still concerned “with the amount of land that’s already been
purchased,” and people trying to buy land from current owners.
“There’s been no level of trust with the park service as there is and, you know,
we’ve kind of become accustomed to this and we’re just worried what changes
would bring,” Cowell said.
“I feel like they’re in too far now for nothing to happen,” Cowell said.
“I don’t feel like the issue is going away,” King said.
King is speaking at a town hall meeting about changes surrounding the river on
Oct. 26 at 6 p.m. at Jasper High School Cafeteria.
“For all voices to be heard without distractions, Runway will not be formally
attending,” a spokesperson said.
Westerman also said he would like to host a town hall in the future.
Posted Wednesday, October 25, 2023 9:45 am
By Ellen Kreth, For the Record
Part 1
The Runway Group of Bentonville is “retracting” the idea of turning federal land
around the Buffalo National River into a national park preserve, according to
State Sen. Bryan King, R-Green Forest, who represents District 28, which includes
Madison County.
After meeting last Friday with Runway Group’s Director of State and Federal
Affairs Mary Robin Casteel and lobbyist John Burris, King said the Runway Group
“seemed to be open to more dialogue.”
“There’s nothing to pause because we’ve kind of done what we set out to do,
which was to present an idea. We definitely think the idea is worth exploring,”
Runway Group’s Vice President of Corporate and Community A!airs Krista Cupp
said.
“There’s no next steps right now because it’s not our decision to make,” Cupp
Designating public lands around the Buffalo National River as a national park
preserve requires federal legislation.
Legislation has not been drafted and there’s been no attempt to do so, according
to U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., who represents Arkansas’ 4th
Congressional District and chairs the Natural Resources Committee.
“I would say we’re in listening mode. People have ideas and I know there’s folks
debating the pros and cons of it,” Westerman said on Monday.
Steuart and Tom Walton own the Runway Group, a holding company investing in
real estate, outdoor initiatives, conservation and recreation as well as hospitality
and businesses in Northwest Arkansas.
They are grandsons of Walmart founder Sam Walton and sons of Jim Walton, who
owns thousands of acres of land in Kington in Madison County.
In addition to the land, a spokesperson for Runway Group told The Record, “As
part of a restoration effort, members of the Walton family acquired three historic
buildings on the square in downtown Kingston, intending to update them and
open their doors to the community. While we don’t yet have a timeline for the
opening, we will share more when we do.”
The Walton family purchased the buildings a couple of years ago. A spokesperson
for the family said they have no other plans to develop the Kingston property.
Burris invited legislators representing counties in close proximity to the Buffalo
National River to breakfast at the state Capitol to explain recent poll results
conducted by Runway about the possible change in land designation and to “get
your feedback moving forward. There isn’t a plan yet of any kind. We just want to
start the dialogue with y’all.”
A group calling itself a Coalition for Buffalo River National Park Preserve began
exploring the idea of making public land near the Bu!alo National River a
national park preserve touting the designation as a way to make the area the
“most active-use National Park in the country for outdoor recreation.”
The coalition states its’ purpose “is exploring new ideas to preserve, enhance, and
drive economic benefit for the Buffalo National River.” Officials have neither
divulged members of the coalition nor established a meeting date.
Increased infrastructure
Designating public lands around the river as a national park preserve “would
provide needed infrastructure support to a growing number of tourists; would
support the preservation of the river and its current boundaries; and would
create new ways to benefit the surrounding communities,” a statement from the
Runway Group said.
The coalition is using the New River Gorge Park and Preserve in West Virginia as a
model, which does not require fees or permits, allows fishing and hunting and
access to the river at multiple public access points.
Westerman said infrastructure around the Bu!alo National River gets stressed
with more traffic.
“Even if it just remains a national river and doesn’t get a park designation, there
needs to be some investment in the infrastructure and restrooms is one of those
things and the roads leading to the river. A lot of those places are not in the best
of shape.
“So there’s many things that could be improved to enhance the experience on the
river and also to, you know, harden the infrastructure so that you’re not doing
damage on the river with all the visitors.”
Timeline
In July 2022, the Runway Group approached Westerman about designating the
river’s public lands as a national park preserve.
In January 2023, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed an executive order
establishing the Natural State Advisory Group and appointed Bryan Sanders, her
husband, as chairman. The council is tasked with growing tourism in Arkansas
and the “outdoor economy,” according to a news release.
Gov. Sanders also appointed Tom Walton as one of the 18 members of the
advisory group. So far no meetings have been announced or open to the public,
but the group has been active in exchanging emails regarding tourism and parks
plans.
The Record requested minutes from any meetings but has not received a
response.
King said he is “gravely disappointed and concerned about the natural state
working group,” and its’ lack of transparency, which he said is contributing to
“mistrust.”
In April, according to King, conversations about changing the land to a national
park preserve began “with state officials. My understanding these conversations
started with the governor, governor’s husband and Sen. (Missy Thomas) Irvin,” R Mountain View.
King said he was disappointed local officials in his district were not notified.
“If I had been informed about conversations about the Buffalo, the first phone call I would of made would have been to my local folks,” King said.
In May, Bryan Sanders contacted Irvin “to discuss the Buffalo River,” Irvin wrote
on social media.
She reached out to the Searcy County Chamber of Commerce director, “who was
ready to meet. Then we never heard back from the First Gentleman’s office and
no meeting ever occurred,” Irvin wrote.
Irvin stated she did not discuss the change with Gov. Sanders or Runway Group
officials.
“Mr. Sanders needed to hear directly from my constituents,” Irvin wrote about
issues concerning the river.
Also in May, when Bryan Sanders spoke to the Rotary Club of Little Rock, he told
the crowd that he wanted to double the state’s outdoor recreation economy from
its current $3.5 billion to $7 billion in the next 10 years.
The Runway Group emphasized making the federal lands abutting the river into a
national preserve would spark more tourism, increasing money for
infrastructure.
On Monday, Gov. Sanders appointed Dalaney Thomas director of tourism.
Thomas worked at an advertising agency handling the state’s parks and tourism
account. On the advertising agency’s website, Thomas said her favorite place to
visit is the Buffalo National River area.
About six months ago, a former representative reached out to Dustin Cowell, a
Real Estate appraiser in Mt. Judea, about serving on a committee to explore
turning the land around the river into a national park.
Even though Cowell opposes making any changes, he said he would be willing to
serve on the committee, but he “never heard anything else about it.”
Cowell said, “They even mentioned that it was kind of from the governor’s office.”
End of Part 1. See Part 2
October 24, 2023
Recently, a suggestion was pushed forward that changing the Buffalo National River to a National Park might be a good thing. It's an interesting idea, and all interesting ideas evoke different reactions.
The Runway Group of Bentonville, underwritten by Steuart and Tom Walton--heirs to a really big global retail store whose family does a whole lot of really good things for Arkansas--released the detailed results of a poll pondering the question.
First, a little background. In 1972, the Buffalo, one of the few free-flowing rivers left in the United States, was designated as the first-ever National River. It provided a lot of good before it was designated and has since.
Most Arkansans who are so inclined to get in a canoe for the sake of getting in a canoe have gently paddled alongside its high bluffs and breathtaking beauty at least once. It's a Natural State staple for any outdoors-minded Arkansan. A YouTube search will reveal numerous videos of out-of-staters who travel here to paddle specific sections, or its entirety in some cases.
Last year alone, the Buffalo, already administered by the National Park Service, attracted 1.3 million visitors and contributed nearly $65 million in economic output to the state.
That's good money, but could it be better?
It was for West Virginia when the New River Gorge converted from National River to National Park in 2020. As a National Park, visitors increased from about 1 million to just south of 1.7 million in the first year. Economic activity increased from $152 million to $269 million. That's real money.
But talking is all we're doing, at least for now.
If this is going to happen, Arkansas Rep. Bruce Westerman will be key. The path (or river in this case) to becoming a National Park runs right through the House Natural Resources Committee, which Representative Westerman chairs.
He says, "We're a long ways from me even writing a bill . . . What I've said all along is you need buy-in from the community. This is not a process that should be rushed. We're just discussing an issue and . . . hearing different sides . . . "
This calls for immediate discussion! (Python, M.) That's where the Runway Group comes in as the first, but certainly not last, mover. This is some of what they found in their survey:
40 percent of respondents said the river gets too many visitors already
58 percent said they think that's a bad reason to be against re-designation
82 percent said it was "very important" that no private land be taken for this purpose
75 percent said it was "very important" that no new taxes be involved (14 percent said this was fairly important and 10 percent said it was unimportant)
While it's true that opinions may change in light of any new details that may arise from public meetings, the Runway Group should be applauded for getting the ball rolling and getting a pulse on how the public feels about it today.
It's not hard to see the foundation of what a piece of legislation could look like based on this data. It's a start. Where it ends will be up to the public.
Axios NW Arkansas
Oct 24, 2023 -
News
The Runway Group won't participate in an informational town hall to provide locals clarity about the future of Buffalo National River's designation.
Driving the news: Runway — a holding company owned by Walmart heirs Steuart and Tom Walton — posted results of a poll online this month that said nearly two-thirds of respondentswould support changing the national river to a national park and preserve.
"We think the town hall is a great idea and the first step to bringing this idea to the table," a spokesperson for Runway said in an email.
Why it matters: A national park designation could boost the state's tourism economy by bringing in more federal money to develop modern amenities like roads, campsites and bathrooms.
Catch up quick: Survey results were published on a website titled "Coalition for the Future of the Buffalo National River." The site says the coalition is "made of people who want to sit around a table and discuss new ideas."
Langdon and state Sen. Bryan King (R-Green Forest) said they feel Runway hasn't been transparent about the poll.
King; Gordon Watkins, president of the Buffalo River Watershed Alliance; Jack Stewart of the Audubon Society; and others will be panelists at the meeting.
Context: The Buffalo became the first national river in 1972. Changing it from a national river to a national park and preserve would safeguard hunting and fishing access but could lead to land-use restrictions.
By the numbers: 412 registered voters in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton and Searcy counties were asked 14 questions about the issue.
Deltaplex News
Tue, October 24, 2023 by Greg
Arkansas Tourism Has Never Been Stronger
Column of Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Secretary Shea Lewis
You may have seen them paddling down the Buffalo River last spring. Maybe you ran into them mountain biking one of our state park Monument Trails this summer. Or you may see their out of state plates en route to the Delta to go duck hunting this winter.
They’re tourists. Arkansas has never seen so many.
Our State’s Department of Tourism just completed its comprehensive tourism economic study for last year. The numbers are staggering.
48.3 million people visited Arkansas in 2022, about sixteen times our state’s population. They spent $9.2 billion while here. That’s an annual increase of 17.1% and 15.4%, respectively.
And as any Arkansan will tell you, the flood isn’t letting up any time soon.
This is all especially good news given that just three years ago, Arkansas’ tourism industry was headed for disaster. The pandemic brought empty hotel rooms and shuttered restaurants, leaving many to wonder if our tourism industry would ever recover.
Well, you can put those concerns to rest. When you combine its direct and indirect impacts, the tourism industry created $15.7 billion in economic activity in our state. That makes it our state’s second-largest industry after agriculture.
Even better, all those full hotel rooms and crowded restaurants generated $24.3 million in Tourism Reinvestment Tax revenue. That’s up 15.8% over the previous year and the highest sum ever. This revenue will be invested right back into marketing our beautiful state, driving even more tourists to Arkansas.
This is all great news for the nearly 70,000 Arkansans employed in the tourism industry, towns big and small, and rural communities all across the Natural State.
But we know we can do even better.
The Sanders Administration was elected to shake up the status quo. Last year’s tourism numbers were great, but we want to keep smashing records in 2023.
That starts with smart policymaking. At the beginning of this administration, Arkansas’ First Gentleman, Bryan Sanders, spearheaded a new working group called the Natural State Initiative to bring together the greatest minds in the public and private sectors and make Arkansas’ outdoor economy even stronger.
Their work paid off quickly, with the legislature passing sweeping reforms last spring to expand access to world class outdoor recreation, including hunting, fishing, cycling, mountain biking, rock climbing, and paddling. We cut red tape at state parks to improve maintenance and amenities for state park visitors.
We established the Natural State Initiative Pilot Program to empower entrepreneurs to test out new concepts in existing recreation areas – things like food, beverage, lodging, and guide services.
We expanded grant initiatives to fund high-impact recreation projects in small towns and broadened the Historic Tax Credit to encourage main street revitalization. And the Sanders Family’s favorite: we cut the price in half for lifetime hunting and fishing licenses for Arkansans under ten to get more kids off screens and outdoors.
All this government action is matching a flurry of activity from businesses and nonprofits. Little Rock’s Museum of Fine Arts recently reopened its doors with a comprehensive facelift, while the long-awaited Marshals Museum in Fort Smith opened this summer. Crystal Bridges is undergoing a massive expansion to cement its status as one of the best museums in America.
Outdoor Magazine just named Arkansas’ state park Monument Trails the best mountain biking trails in the United States, showcasing the natural beauty of four of our finest state parks. The Arkansas Graveler’s inaugural race next year will take riders from around the world on an epic journey through the Ozark Mountains from Fayetteville to Jonesboro.
The Mississippi Flyway is teeming with ducks. Our lakes are teeming with boats. Our roadways and airports are teeming with visitors. And they’ll be even busier next April when Arkansas will be one of the best viewing sites in the country for the Great American Eclipse.
Our tourism industry is taking off, and the Sanders Administration is adding rocket fuel.
What does this mean for Arkansans? More jobs, more investment, and more ways to have fun, for starters. But it also puts Arkansas on the map as the best place to live, work, and raise a family – something we think can be even more important to the growth of our state.
Get ready to see a whole lot more tourists here in Arkansas. The rest of the world is about to discover that there is no better place than the Natural State.
By Senator Greg Leding
If you care about the Buffalo River, follow this story closely. Consider subscribing to the Madison County Record. Write letters to the editor, participate in meetings and town halls when you can, and do contact your state lawmakers. While they can’t change the river’s designation, they can certainly signal their support or opposition to our governor and congressional delegation.
NEWS
BY
ON
6:57 pm
Faced with angry pushback from rural Arkansans, the Walton-founded Runway Group is setting aside a campaign to turn the Buffalo National River and nearby land into a national park preserve.
Further, the name of a long-suspected player in the ill-fated effort has now emerged, though he remains mum: It’s Bryan Sanders, husband of Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
For months, rumors circulated that the first gentleman was working with Runway on efforts to change the federal status of the Buffalo National River. But no one with any political credentials dared to make the connection publicly.
“My understanding is they’re backing off at this point in time,” King (R-Green Forest) told the Arkansas Times after fewer than a dozen legislators met Friday in Little Rock with Runway Group representatives, including the investment company’s lobbyist, John Burris.
“They didn’t expect the backlash,” said King, whose legislative district includes some of the Buffalo region. King also took to X, formerly known as Twitter, where he said, “The runway group said they have no plans to move forward at this time.”
Now, two state lawmakers — Sens. Bryan King and Missy Irvin — have linked Bryan Sanders to the discussion, though Irvin said she did not know Sanders’ position on the matter.
Irvin (R-Mountain View) told the Arkansas Times that she learned about the matter belatedly as well, and said she called U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, chairman of the House Committee on Natural Resources, earlier this month.
Irvin said Westerman told her Runway representatives had met with him about the idea. She said she then called Burris to learn more. Burris told her the Waltons were backing off their plans.
Burris declined comment for this article.
Runway has made no public comment since last week when it posted a brief statement online amid residents’ loud pushback after a Runway-commissioned survey of Buffalo-area residents brought rumors into the open.
“We wanted to explore a new idea for our home state together. However, this is not our decision to make. There is no new action being taken,” Runway said last Tuesday. About the same time, Runway told the Arkansas Times it would not participate in a town hall planned for Thursday night in Jasper about this issue.
Pressed for further comment Monday, Runway spokesman J.T. Geren said only, “What we shared Friday is what we continue to share.” He then repeated a statement given last Tuesday.
The only statement Friday was one that appeared in an Arkansas Democrat-Gazette article in which Runway spokeswoman Krista Cupp said, “This re-designation is just an idea that’s being floated out there.
“This is an idea that we certainly think is worth exploring, but there’s nothing new happening right now,” Cupp added.
King said he fears Runway’s step back is only a delay, especially considering the more than 6,000 acres Walton Enterprises now owns in Madison County after a recent property buying spree. “I don’t think this issue is going away,” King said.
The land purchase in the Kingston area by King’s Creek LLC, owned by Walton Enterprises, looks “bad and is a major reason for the mistrust,” King said in a separate statement given to the Madison County Record. The Record reported the land purchases last week.
In the statement, King said Runway representatives told the legislators that “this conversation started back in April and May with state officials.”
“My understanding, these conversations started with the governor, the governor’s husband and Sen. Irvin,” King said. Irvin called King’s statement about her role a “lie.”
Further, Irvin said she believed Runway representatives told legislators that it was 1 1/2 years ago that they first met with Westerman about the matter.
“So I believe that may have been June of 2022 and only with him, and then had ongoing meetings with his staff for his committee,” she said in a statement shared on the Madison County Record‘s Facebook page.
Congressional approval would be needed to make the Buffalo National River a national park or a national park preserve. Unlike in a national park, people can still hunt and trap in a park preserve. There also can be oil and gas exploration and mining extraction in a park preserve, though Runway said it doesn’t support either in the area.
Neither Westerman nor his spokeswoman could be reached for comment.
Irvin said Bryan Sanders contacted her in May “to discuss the Buffalo River.”
“I told him he needed to meet directly with my constituents,” she wrote on Facebook. “At which point I reached out to … the Searcy County Chamber of Commerce director who was ready to meet. Then we never heard back from the first gentleman’s office and no meeting ever occurred.”
Irvin said she “never once discussed this” matter with the governor.
Referring to King’s comment about Irvin’s early involvement in conversations about the Buffalo, Irvin said, “This is an outright lie and misrepresentation. I never had a single conversation with the the Runway Group. I was contacted once and said any conversation had to start local. I have always advocated for anyone to meet directly with my constituents. Unfortunately that never happened.”
Irvin said she and others involved with the Buffalo River Conservation Committee have repeatedly and clearly stated their opposition to any change in the Buffalo’s current status.
In a statement Thursday on X, Irvin wrote, “I stand with my constituents in opposing a change in the designation of the Buffalo National River.
“It is critically important to respect the people who have forged their lives from these mountains & who continue to live with the pain of losing their homesteads, their heritage,” she added.
Irvin said in an interview that she had “no idea Runway was even involved” in the Buffalo effort until the survey, conducted in September in five counties along the river, came out.
She questioned why the federal government would want to expand its footprint when it “can’t even take care of what we’ve got.”
King told the Arkansas Times he had also been unaware of these discussions about changing the Buffalo River designation. Not talking with local residents upfront was “disrespectful and uncaring,” he said.
He said he told Runway officials that he “was very disappointed that the local government and people were not notified of the discussion.”
Despite reportedly stepping back from the Buffalo effort, a fact sheet on Runway Group’s website still refers to the “shared objective” of a “coalition for the future of the Buffalo River National Park Preserve.” It does not identify any coalition members.
Referring to the newly created Natural State Advisory Council chaired by First Gent Bryan Sanders, King said, “I have a real issue with the Natural State committee not being transparent and accountable to local communities.”
A Sept. 6 council meeting’s agenda, obtained under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, lists the item “Buffalo National River Discussion” but gives no details and no speaker.
Bryan Sanders is friends of Tom Walton and Steuart Walton, co-founders of the Runway Group and grandsons of Walmart founder Sam Walton. Tom Walton also serves on the advisory council, as did Mike Mills, whom the governor fired in June from his position as secretary of the state Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism. Shea Lewis, the department’s new secretary, succeeded Mills on the council.
Bryan Sanders, his chief of staff and the governor’s spokeswoman have not responded to repeated requests for comment.
Rumors about the Buffalo have simmered since June when Mills was fired. Those rumors gained credibility and went viral when the Runway survey was done in September in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton and Searcy counties.
King said the first gentleman is the one who “needs to answer questions.”
Darryl Treat, executive director of the Greater Searcy County Chamber of Commerce, released a statement Monday saying, “We reject a change in [the Buffalo National River’s] name and status.”
“There is no place for the exclusion of local people from discussions about changes that have consequential impacts to their lands, homes, and future,” said Treat, noting that Searcy County is home to about 48 miles of the river.
Reflecting how little residents and civic leaders were informed, an FOI request showed that Treat contacted an official with Parks, Heritage and Tourism on Sept. 29 to ask about “any possible discussion” regarding a change in the river’s status.
Katherine Andrews, director of the department’s Office of Outdoor Recreation, replied to Treat, “We’re fielding a lot of questions about this. It falls in a couple divisions within [the state department] and we are looking at it.”
Treat replied, “This is going to be a MAJOR FIGHT! We have close to zero trust in the National Park Service.”
In his statement to the Arkansas Times, Treat said local people should have the largest part to play in their own self determination and future. “We have been told that a change to the river’s federal status would bring us an economic benefit, but when we asked to see a plan we were told there was no plan to see,” Treat said.
“As the local people who live, die, farm, and raise our families here, we insist that we have a prominent and influential voice pertaining to all matters concerning the present and future of the Buffalo National River. We assert the rights of local people to decide local matters.”
Debra Hale-Shelton
Debra Hale-Shelton is a reporter for the Arkansas Times. She has previously worked for The Associated Press and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
Buffalo River Watershed Alliance is a non profit 501(c)(3) organization
Copyright @ 2019
Contact Us