Democrat Gazette

Opinion

OPINION | REX NELSON: Loving it to death

by Rex Nelson | Today at 4:10 a.m.

History is repeating itself in the Arkansas Ozarks.

When a brave band of environmentalists began the fight decades ago to have the Buffalo River designated as the nation’s first national river, their strongest opposition came from area residents. Now that a new group is attempting to have the river upgraded to national park status, complaints are again being heard.

The difference in this era of social media is that misinformation spreads like wildfire, people become upset, and politicians feel the need to demagogue an issue rather than simply explain the facts.

“The continual threat of a dam on the Buffalo caught the attention of Arkansas conservation groups and those who had begun using the river for recreation,” Suzie Rogers writes for the Central Arkansas Library System’s Encyclopedia of Arkansas. “In the early 1960s, advocates for dams and advocates for a free-flowing stream formed opposing organizations. The pro-dam Buffalo River Improvement Association, established by James Tudor of Marshall, and the anti-dam Ozark Society, which included environmentalist Neil Compton, emerged as the leading players in the drama.

“The dam proponents worked with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Rep. James Trimble. The free-flowing stream advocates made overtures to the U.S. Department of the Interior. In 1961, a National Park Service planning team undertook a site survey of the Buffalo River area. The team was favorably impressed and recommended establishment of a park on the Buffalo River to be called a national river.” Years of intense political and public relations battles followed.

“A decade of political maneuverings, speeches and media attention—including a canoe trip on the Buffalo by Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas—came to a head in December 1965 when Gov. Orval Faubus wrote the Corps that he could not support the idea of a dam on the Buffalo,” Rogers writes. “The Corps withdrew its proposal. In 1966, John Paul Hammerschmidt of Harrison defeated Trimble and indicated that he would support the concept of creating a park along the river.

“Hammerschmidt and Sens. J. William Fulbright and John L. McClellan introduced the first Buffalo National River park legislation in 1967. The final park legislation was introduced in 1971, and hearings were held in late 1971. In February 1972, Congress voted to establish the nation’s first national river.” President Richard Nixon signed legislation to put the river under the protection of the National Park Service on March 1, 1972, a century after the establishment of Yellowstone, the first national park.

The law states: “That for the purposes of conserving and interpreting an area containing unique scenic and scientific features, and preserving as a free-flowing stream an important segment of the Buffalo River in Arkansas for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations, the Secretary of the Interior … may establish and administer the Buffalo National River.” The area overseen by NPS encompasses 135 miles of the 150-mile-long river. According to the law, total acreage can’t exceed 95,730 acres. Hunting and fishing are allowed as traditional uses. Many residents were given an option to use their land for up to 25 years. Still, eminent domain proceedings were necessary, and feelings were hurt.

There has always been a deep distrust of government in the hills of Newton, Searcy, Marion, Madison and Baxter counties. That distrust erupted again this fall with word that a coalition is floating the idea of making the Buffalo National River a national park preserve. A regular national park restricts hunting and other activities. A national park preserve would protect hunting, fishing and trapping rights.

The group is using as a model New River Gorge National Park and Preserve in West Virginia. It allows hunting and fishing and doesn’t require fees or permits.

New River Gorge National River was established in 1978. It was redesignated in 2021 as New River Gorge National Park and Preserve. It encompasses more than 70,000 acres along 53 miles of the New River. The river, thought to be among the oldest rivers in the world, carved the deepest and longest river gorge in the Appalachian Mountains.

Why the status change? Because national park status will make the Buffalo a higher priority inside the National Park Service. And adding “preserve” prohibits additional restrictions and fees. Rumors about use of eminent domain and stringent restrictions are simply false. Elected officials need to have the guts to tell their constituents that the rumors have no basis in fact.

“We’re loving the Buffalo to death,” says Mike Mills, the Arkansas outdoors icon who knows more about the river than anyone alive. Mills says more federal funding is needed for parking at trailheads and for public restrooms. People now park along roads, often blocking traffic. They also use the woods as their restroom. Most of the current infrastructure dates back to the late 1970s.

Austin Albers, president and owner of Buffalo Outdoor Center, told The Madison County Record: “You’re looking at positive economic impact, prolonging and protecting the national park, the national river, protecting what brings people here—hunting, fishing, floating, all of that. None of that changes. And that’s why it’s a national park preserve and not just a national park.

“So if we can transition to a national park preserve versus a national river …. and get more infrastructure put into place, I think it’s a win for everybody.” Rumors began to spread when the coalition hired Selzer & Co. to poll 412 voters in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton and Searcy counties. The survey was conducted Sept. 11-13. It found that: m 95 percent were in favor of no private land being taken to create a national park preserve.

m 93 percent were in favor of rules protecting the river from pollution and industrial uses.

m 89 percent opposed any new taxes to support the national park preserve.

m 86 percent were in favor of grandfathering local businesses into any new commercial business rules.

m 83 percent were in favor of hunting regulations staying the same.

m 64 percent said they would want their member of Congress to vote for designation of the river as a national park preserve.

Nearly a fifth of Americans are within 500 miles of the Buffalo National River. In that area, there are only three national parks: Hot Springs, Mammoth Cave in Kentucky, and Gateway Arch in Missouri. None of those are recreation-focused areas.

“More visitors are coming,” a flyer from the coalition states. “Our natural lands must be actively preserved—or be lost. Private investments are certainly expected to increase interest and visitors. . . . In this rural part of the country, nature is treasured and many make their living from an economy that depends on tourism. Requiring only a change in the lands’s designation, more visitors will bring more jobs and more economic benefits.” In addition to their distrust of government, those who live in these hills distrust outsiders. They’re concerned by the large amounts of land being bought by entities associated with brothers Tom and Steuart Walton of Bentonville. I know the Walton brothers, and I want to make one thing clear: Their motives are pure. They realize that our state’s ability to attract and keep talented people in the decades ahead will rest in part on our protecting and enhancing outdoor recreational attributes.

The Walton brothers could live anywhere in the world and do anything they want. But their focus these days is on enhancing quality of life in Arkansas. Other states should be so lucky. Their involvement in the Coalition for Buffalo River National Park Preserve doesn’t worry me. It gives me hope that this effort will succeed.

—––––– –––––—

Rex Nelson is a senior editor at the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.

Democrat Gazette

OPINION | MIKE MASTERSON: Leave Buffalo as is

by Mike Masterson | November 4, 2023 

An Arkansas LLC's exploratory idea to change the designation of our half-century-old Buffalo National River into a national park and preserve to promote "the best path forward to conserve our national treasure" drew an unfavorable earful from about 1,000 Newton County residents and others at a town-hall meeting in Jasper last week.

Reporters for the Harrison Daily Times and other media outlets squeezed into the wall-to-wall crowd at the school cafeteria to document the responses of those who would be directly affected by the concept.

A Newton County heritage preservation group called the Remnants Project had invited the Runway Group, which had been heading conversations and conducting a poll about the economic growth potential of the Buffalo National River region and making into a national park, the Times reported in an in-depth account. Representatives of Runway chose not to attend the Jasper gathering, which many found surprising.

Founded by Tom and Steuart Walton, Runway is a holding company that invests in real estate and businesses in northwest Arkansas including outdoor initiatives, but hasn't made any formal statement except to say it is in early-stage conversations around the Buffalo's designation and are eager to listen and collaborate with the community.

Of the 10 speakers, some like Gordon Watkins of Parthenon with the Buffalo Watershed Alliance (and friend from the Buffalo River hog factory struggles a few years back) said that due to the influx of tourists to the river and large surrounding land acquisitions, the people who live in Newton County and the immediate region need a seat at the table when it comes to proposing changes so they're not taken by surprise.

He said his organization would be opposed to acquisition of an unwilling seller's property, or any plan that failed to ensure sustainable preservation of the water quality.

The level of government mistrust in the national park idea was apparent in the room in a community that has grown up enjoying, appreciating and making a living from the river.

Billy Bell of Newton County, who grew up on the Buffalo and its tributaries, expressed some of those feelings, the paper wrote. "Playing on the popularity of a recent song, he said, 'Rich Men Not From Here' are pushing to change residents' way of life. He said he sees a bait and switch operation playing on the people's emotions and as a scare tactic. The river is public land and it and its public uses are already adequately protected, he said. Re-designation is not needed and we do not need other people to decide how to change 'our' Buffalo River. He said proponents of re-designation are using the old battle cry, 'Save the Buffalo River,' to spin public opinion and exploit the Buffalo National River for their own personal gain."

Wendy Finn of Fayetteville reviewed survey results and said they were confusing and lacked sufficient facts for a respondent to give an informed answer, and the data can possibly be skewed.

Finn also pointed out that Runway concluded 64 percent of those surveyed were in favor of changing the river to a national park or preserve. However, surveyors failed to explain what the terms in the survey meant, which is critical to understand the implications and conclusions drawn from it.

State Sen. Bryan King of Green Forest, whose district includes portions of the Buffalo, offered thoughts on those results and said he felt obligated to make certain his constituents understood what was happening with the river. "This train had been rolling down the track. I didn't want the people I represent to be railroaded," he said.

Referring to the survey. King said only those living in the watershed should have been polled; his investigation of the survey showed that though 14 percent of the watershed is in Baxter County, 47 percent of the respondents lived there.

As someone born 20 minutes from the Buffalo, I spent many a childhood summer's day wading, fishing, swimming and enjoying its magnificence. Little wonder it attracts scores of thousands from around the country that annually leave behind millions of dollars in these hills. And with a late uncle who in 1972 was a key political figure in designating our Buffalo as the country's first national river, I naturally have an interest in this idea to commercialize the natural beauty beyond what exists.

True, it would bring additional millions of people to the region to enjoy what is already a crowded stream during seasonal months. Bumper-to-bumper canoes floating through groups of swimmers and fishermen isn't an attractive way to attract tourism.

True, it would bring in more money as a tradeoff for what we have. True, it would bring additional commercial ventures with thousands more T-shirts, knick-knacks, peanut brittle and canoe rentals. And I really can't fault anyone for floating the idea of expanding and enlarging the gift God has given us to preserve and protect.

But I've never considered the Buffalo a commercial draw to lucrative traffic from many more visitors to further overcrowd the sanctuary. That strikes me as neither necessary nor wise.

While I do appreciate the way this idea has been approached--asking the people for their thoughts before simply barging ahead behind the scenes then announcing a plan as a done deal--I believe the "best path forward" is leaving well enough alone in our Buffalo's busy, pristine and well-protected waters.

Now go out into the world and treat everyone you meet exactly like you want them to treat you.

Mike Masterson is a longtime Arkansas journalist, was editor of three Arkansas dailies and headed the master's journalism program at Ohio State University. Email him at mmasterson@arkansasonline.com.

Newton County Times

Runway no show; people say, no way

Posted Wednesday, November 1, 2023 8:00 am

Staff Report

JASPER — A town hall meeting to hear from proponents of further conserving the Buffalo National River area was held as scheduled Thursday night, Oct. 26, at the Jasper School cafeteria in Jasper. But the main invitees did not attend. However, more than an estimated 1,000 people did show up with several publicly voicing opposition to a group's proposal to have the national river re-designated either a national park or preserve.
Misty Langdon, creator of the Remnants Project, a nonprofit heritage preservation group in Newton County, called for the meeting with the Runway Group LLC, which was leading conversations and had conducted a poll among some residents about their feelings and beliefs about economic growth of the Buffalo National River region.
Runway is a holding company that invests in real estate, outdoor initiatives, hospitality, and businesses in Northwest Arkansas. Its founders are brothers Tom and Steuart Walton.
The company has not made any formal, or public statements, other than what it has published on its website runwaynwa.com and have been circulated over social media. It has also established info@futureofthebuffalo.org, the Coalition for the Future of the Buffalo River National Park Preserve. “We are participating in early stage conversations around the Buffalo River designation. We are eager to listen and collaborate with the community to support the best path forward to conserve our national treasure here in Arkansas.”
Langdon said she hoped the town hall event would give clarity to the proponents’ proposals, provide local residents with first-hand information and give them the opportunity to ask questions, she said, but was disappointed when Runway representatives contacted her Thursday morning and told her they would not attend.
According to a statement appearing on the organization's website, "We think the town hall is a great idea and the first step to bringing this idea to the table. We’ve been informed of the upcoming town hall and shared with the organizer that we looked forward to hearing how the conversation unfolded. For all voices to be heard without distractions, Runway will not be formally attending."
School officials said about 850 chairs were set up in the cafeteria. All were taken leaving standing room only. The overflow of people went out into the student union area and the adjoining hallway.
The Newton County Library was also broadcasting the event on Zoom. Library director Kenya Windel said all 500 Zoom reservations were filled. The meeting, which lasted about an hour and 40 minutes, was also aired live on the library's Facebook page where she said it would be archived.
Moderator for the evening was Jasper Mayor Michael Thomas. He said written questions would be accepted from the audience at the end of the presentation from a panel of speakers. Each question would be forwarded to the proper group or individual who could possibly answer it. Or, individuals could pose their question on Zoom after the meeting.
The panel consisted of 10 speakers.
Jackie Alexander representing Back Country Horsemen of Arkansas and America was the first presenter. The non-profit group's mission is the common sense use and enjoyment of horses in the back country and the wilderness, she said. It works to ensure public lands remain open to recreational stock use. She gave an accounting of the number of volunteers and the hours of service contributed to maintaining horse trails along the river. She said she was not attending the meeting to state a position on behalf of the organization, but to learn. None of the members' interests have been discussed or mentioned as being accommodated with whatever plan is coming to the river, Alexander said, adding the contributions of the organization have not been recognized, either. "We want to be included and be part of the conversation going forward."
Wendy Finn, of Fayetteville, agreed. “We need to be a part of these decisions so they don't make decisions about our lives without us.”
Finn reviewed some of the results of the survey Runway used to come to its conclusions.
The survey can be confusing where there is a lack of information to make an informed decision as a respondent to the survey and where the data can possibly be skewed, she said.
The conclusion the Runway Group drew from the survey was 64% of those surveyed were in favor of designating the Buffalo River a national park and preserve. But those surveyors did not define what those terms meant for the respondents and that is crucial to understand the implications and the conclusions that could be drawn from the survey, Finn pointed out.
The national river designation has been in effect since 1972. It preserves free flowing streams and prohibits dams or alterations of the waterway. It protects it from industrial uses, but allows hiking, canoeing and hunting.

A national park restricts hunting, mining, fishing and oil extraction. A preserve does allow hunting, fishing, and may allow extraction of minerals and fuels. Management may be transferred to local or state authorities.
Also, contrary to Runway's justifications, there would be no change to how the park is funded based on its designation. That is according to a National Park Service public affairs specialist, Finn related.
The survey only sampled a small number of people, 412 in five counties. The greatest number, 47%, of those surveyed were from Baxter County. Only 7% of people surveyed, nine, were from Newton County.
Adding to the contrasting data was visitation data. Langdon, a small business owner, said data from the National Park Service shows that from 2020-2022 the number of recreation visits increased by 6.5% compared to the prior three years 2017-2019. Runway's projections call for a 60% increase in tourism. That would change the landscape, Langdon said. "I want growth at a sustainable rate, not at the cost of what makes this place our home."
Jack Stewart, representing the Arkansas Audubon Society, a nonprofit, 100% volunteer-operated organization devoted to the study, conservation and enjoyment of birds, is affiliated with the nation-wide organization that has a far reach in contacting legislators. If it is shown the plan would harm the habitat, the Audubon Society will stand with you, he pledged.
But he added some advice, too. "Part of the problem is we are not consulted at the start and are never given complete information on what these folks have in mind. Situations like this will keep happening. Change is unstoppable. But we can bend it to our will and shape it to our liking and our benefit. The second part of the problem is we lack an agreed upon vision of the future. Without some rules we are sitting ducks. We can't be against all regulation. Without an agreed upon vision it will be easy for some group to divide us and conquer."
Billy Bell, a native of Newton County, gave the evening's passionate observation of the situation. He said he has spent his life on the river and its tributaries and a career spanning more than 20 years in resource enforcement. "I am not for the re-designation of the Buffalo River."
Playing on the popularity of a recent song, he said, "Rich Men Not From Here" are pushing to change residents' way of life. He said he sees a bait and switch operation playing on the peoples' emotions and as a scare tactic. The river is public land and it and its public uses are already adequately protected, he said. Re-designation is not needed and we do not need other people to decide how to change "our" Buffalo River. He said proponents of re-designation are using the old battle cry, "Save the Buffalo River," to spin public opinion and exploit the Buffalo National River for their own personal gain.
Jack Boles, president of the Newton County Farm Bureau, said the available information about the proposal was received by the board of directors. He said a deep look was made at every potential twist and turn. The board came to the conclusion there is no benefit and no advantage anywhere for agriculture or for the people in Newton County or for their way of life under this proposal. Newton County Farm Bureau's official position is that it opposes any change of the name, designation or expansion of the Buffalo National River, he declared. This has been put in the form of a resolution. It will be presented to the state organization for it to approve and send on to its lobbyists. "State and national legislative delegations will know where we stand."
Another speaker was Gordon Watkins of Parthenon, a member of the Buffalo Watershed Alliance that watches over and protects the water quality of the area. He said higher visitation to the river and large acquisitions of land surrounding it are trending. We need a seat at the table to discuss planning for change or be victims of it. We need to get into a position where we aren't taken by surprise, he said. The alliance is opposed to any acquisition of land from unwilling sellers.
Economic development is a good thing, but only if it is part of a long-range plan, protects water quality and is controlled, appropriate and sustainable, Watkins continued. He noted water quality is not addressed in the proposal.
Watkins said there have been indications the Walton-funded Runway Group is apparently backing off the proposal, but that is not to say someone else may pick it up.
Another speaker was Bryan King, state senator from Green Forest whose District 28 includes a portion of Newton County and several other areas of the Buffalo River region. He talked about his efforts investigating the Runway proposal and its poll results. I felt I had to bring this issue out, he said, referring to reports appearing in the Madison County Record. "I knew one thing," he said. "This train had been rolling down the track. I didn't want the people I represent to be railroaded." 
Only the people who reside in the Buffalo River watershed should have been polled, he said. He said 14% of the watershed is in Baxter County yet 47% of the respondents were from Baxter County.
Jared Phillips of Washington County is a farmer and teacher on the history faculty at the University of Arkansas. He put the river in the larger context of its importance to the north Arkansas region. He said a re-designation of the river would cost the entire region family land ownership, jobs and a way of life.
Finally, Brinkley Cook-Campbell, an attorney in Ft. Smith who grew up and graduated from Mt. Judea High School, brought an open letter to the meeting to be signed by individual residents and sent to the state's Congressional delegation, to the governor and all state elected officials. A part of the letter reads that a re-designation as a national park preserve would mean... "an end to our way of life. It would mean visitors centers and asphalt, restrictions on access and parking, day use permits and lines of traffic."

Arkansas Advocate

Panel approves Buffalo River water-quality project over trail connectivity proposal

Committee’s last $70,000 from original $2 million fund will go to Mill Creek monitoring

BY: ANTOINETTE GRAJEDA - NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

A state panel on Tuesday rejected a proposal to create a recreation master plan for the Buffalo National River in favor of a project that aims to improve water quality through community engagement. 

The Buffalo River Conservation Committee approved the disbursement of its remaining funds, $69,676, to support H2Ozarks’ proposal to hold landowner workshops and implement water quality monitoring in the Mill Creek sub-watershed. 

H2Ozarks’ proposal was one of two water quality projects the panel asked submitters to refine after its September meeting. The second project came from the United States Geological Survey, which proposed a one-year seepage study of a Buffalo River tributary. 

The committee also considered a new proposal Tuesday from the Office of Outdoor Recreation, a division of the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism. Office of Outdoor Recreation Director Katherine Andrews proposed granting the funds to communities surrounding the Buffalo National River corridor to hire a third-party firm to develop a recreation master plan of existing trail connectivity.

Andrews said the project would be community-led so community members would select the firm. Her office could help facilitate discussions and implement the finalized master plan, but Andrews said any trail connections recommended through the master plan would be completed by the communities themselves. Andrews noted there are several grant programs available that could help communities to fund trail connections. 

The proposal prompted a number of questions, including one about how feasible it would be for communities to connect to existing trails in the federal land of the Buffalo National River, which is surrounded by a lot of private land. 

Approximately 60% of the land within the Buffalo River Watershed is privately owned, according to the committee’s 2022 annual report. Federal ownership accounts for about 37% and 3% of the watershed is owned by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission.

One audience member said he was concerned that “if a master plan is developed, then the state will use that master plan against us in the future.” Another man said the proposal would “not be received as well as you think it will” due to ongoing controversy around a proposal to re-designate the federal lands along the Buffalo National River as a national park preserve.

A national river designation preserves free-flowing streams, protects the waterway from industrial uses, and allows for hiking, canoeing and hunting. A national park preserve loosens those restrictions, opens the door for potential mineral extraction and allows management to be transferred to local or state control.

The history of the Buffalo River Conservation Committee dates back to 2016 when then-Gov. Asa Hutchinson created the Beautiful Buffalo River Action Committee, which developed a voluntary watershed management plan. Hutchinson replaced the group three years later by establishing the Buffalo River Conservation Committee through executive order. 

Following legislative approval in 2019, $1 million from the governor’s discretionary fund was transferred to an Arkansas Department of Agriculture account to support grants and projects within the Buffalo River Watershed. Private donors pledged an additional $1 million in support of the Buffalo River Watershed Enhancement Project. 

In 2021, the Arkansas General Assembly passed Act 785 to codify the Buffalo River Conservation Committee into law. The legislation retained the secretaries of the Departments of Agriculture; Health; Energy and Environment; and Parks, Heritage and Tourism as committee members, and added two new ones — the county judges from Newton and Searcy counties. 

Over the years, the committee has funded a variety of projects, including a city of Jasper wastewater treatment facility improvements, a U.S. Geological Survey water survey and feral hog eradication efforts. 

Tuesday’s meeting included discussions about the need for continued funding to support projects like the three proposals presented to the committee. 

Sen. Missy Irvin, R-Mountain View, said she plans to file an appropriations bill in next year’s fiscal session, and hopes she’ll get support. 

Madison County Record

Locals fight to preserve “way of life” around Buffalo River

No current congressional plans as group retracts

Posted Wednesday, November 1, 2023 

By Ellen Kreth, For The Record

JASPER — After a town hall meeting last Thursday, proponents of turning public land around the Buffalo National River into a national park preserve said they would step back from the idea. The following day, a website touting the benefits of re-designating the land was taken down. 

But opponents of the idea are not backing down and don’t trust that efforts to re-designate the land are no longer ongoing. 

Misty Langdon, owner of Steel Creek Cabins, who organized the town hall meeting, said proponents have poured too much time, resources and money “into this project that seems to be linked to Bryan Sanders [Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ husband],” to just walk away. 

In July 2022, the Runway Group approached U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., who represents Arkansas’ 4th Congressional District and chairs the Natural Resources Committee, with the idea of making public land around the river a national park preserve.

Grandsons of Walmart founder Sam Walton and co-founders of the Runway Group, Steuart and Tom Walton are investors in real estate, outdoor initiatives, conservation, recreation, hospitality and businesses in Northwest Arkansas.

Walton Enterprises currently owns more than 6,000 acres in Kingston in Madison County.

The Runway Group also has been linked with working with the governor’s office and the First Gentleman on the possibility of re-designating public lands.

Last Friday, Runway Group’s Vice President of Corporate and Community Affairs Krista Cupp said the group watched the town hall meeting. She reiterated they are not going forward with any proposal for re-designation. There are “no next steps,” she said.

“We wanted to explore a new idea for our home state together. However, this is not our decision to make. There is no new action being taken,” a statement issued earlier by the Runway Group said. 

Cupp said when the group approached Westerman, it didn’t present a proposal to re-designate the land but simply asked if the idea was worth exploring. 

Westerman, who had two staff members attend the town hall, issued a statement saying, in part, “Although it is in the purview of the House Natural Resources Committee to advance legislation to designate National Parks, I’ve made it clear I would not support any proposition that does not have grass roots support from those that live, work, and raise their families in the Buffalo River watershed.”

Westerman also said no plan to write or introduce any legislation re-designating land is underway.

“As the Representative for Arkansas’s Fourth Congressional District, my first priority is advocating on behalf of my constituents. I will continue to listen to the thoughts and concerns of Arkansans that would be impacted by any change in designation,” Westerman stated. 

“The governor is strongly committed to protecting Arkansans’ property rights, hunting rights, and the Buffalo National River,” Alexa Henning, Communications Director for Gov. Sanders, said in a statement.

“She has had an informal conversation with Congressman Westerman but hasn’t seen a plan or taken a position, and doesn’t anticipate any re-designation moving forward in Congress at this time.

“The First Gentleman does not support nor has he even discussed the idea of drilling or mining in the Buffalo National River,” Henning stated.

“The purpose of the Natural State Initiative is to promote outdoor recreation and grow tourism and the outdoor economy, and the First Gentleman is deeply committed to protecting the Buffalo National River and the rights of Arkansans in one of the most beautiful areas of our state.”

In January 2023, Gov. Sanders signed an executive order establishing the Natural State Advisory Group and appointed Bryan Sanders as chairman. Tom Walton is one of the 18 members of the group. So far no meetings have been announced or open to the public, but the group has been active in exchanging e-mails regarding tourism and parks plans.

Langdon said she believes the group for re-designation will “work quietly in the background, but if they are planning to take a step back — we’re ready to take a step forward and we can tango.

“Because this re-designation nonsense has us ready to protect what we hold dear — our way of life. 

“We have seen statements from Congressman Westerman that he would need to see the support of the locals in order to get on board with this re-designation and if the crowd at the town hall is any indicator —I feel the community has made its’ position clear.

“I feel like Runway, Bryan Sanders and anyone else involved should see the writing on the wall and find another swimming hole to play in,” Langdon said.

Town hall meeting

At the town hall meeting, speakers questioned what the potential land re-designation involved, lashed out at the results of a recently conducted survey about the potential change and stressed their desires to preserve their way of life.

They spoke to an overflow-capacity, standing-room only crowd of 1,200 people — more than double the town’s population — that packed the Jasper High School Auditorium. More than 500 people grabbed up Zoom invitations early in the day and 1,400 people watched a livestream by the Newton County Library. 

Jasper School Superintendent Candra Brasel could not remember seeing a crowd that large in the school auditorium. 

Langdon was originally planning for 75, but quickly determined the widespread interest called for a large meeting area. 

“When we hear of people with outside interests who want to commercialize our land and pave over our way life, we get riled up, and rightfully so,” stated Langdon, who is the seventh generation of her mother’s family to live on the same farm and the ninth generation to live on the river. 

Jasper Mayor Mike Thomas, who was acting as town-hall moderator, seemed to be the only non-committal person on the agenda. When asked where he stood on the proposal, he told The Record, “I’m smart enough to know I need more information.”

Thomas said he hoped the night would answer questions about the short- and long-term effects re-designating lands.

Langdon invited the Runway Group to speak also but last week, “Runway informed me that they would no longer participate in the meeting. This is unfortunate as with the others who were invited who chose not to appear.”

Langdon received “a call this morning from Runway wishing us well and asking me to make a comment on their behalf. However, I feel that a statement would be better coming directly from their team,” she said as the crowd cheered. 

A reserved chair with names of some of those not attending, including the Runway Group, Gov. Sanders and Bryan Sanders, sat empty on the stage. 

Seat at the table

After hearing about the proposed re-designation when The Record broke the story on Oct. 4, speakers stressed they felt left out of discussions.

Before the meeting began, Boone County Justice of the Peace Fred Woehl told The Record when the Buffalo River was designated as a national river, the government “took some of my land.” 

In 1972, the river received the designation as the country’s first national river. 

Woehl said he was “ok” with the government’s action because the river has been an asset, but he resents not having a say now.

“Ain’t nobody up here that tells Little Rock what to do,” Woehl said. “So Little Rock shouldn’t tell Newton County what to do.”

Woehl said he knew Sam Walton and his grandsons are 180 degrees different from Sam Walton. 

“Sam is spinning in his grave knowing what’s going on. Sam and I were friends.”

Woehl then turned and faced the crowd and asked a Record reporter, “Do you see any people here on a bike?”.

He was referring to bike trails built by and the interest in biking by the Tom and Steuart Walton, who have invested heavily in trails in Madison County and throughout the state. 

Jacque Alexander with Backcountry Horseman got the first of many interruptions for applause and cheers when she said, “All classes of citizens need to be heard, not just the people with a lot of money,” referring to the Waltons and their wealth.

The Walton family is considered the wealthiest in America, amassing a fortune of more than $245 billion, according to Forbes magazine. 

Newton County has an average median income of approximately $42,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. 

Gordon Watkins of Buffalo River Watershed Alliance said local people should have been involved in discussions from the beginning. He noticed large land purchases and thought, “Somebody is planning something.”

“If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re on the menu,” he said. 

Watkins was alarmed the Runway Group began discussions with Westerman rather than with people who live beside the river and on its tributaries. 

Watkins recognizes the need to plan for future growth but wants to manage the current situation before bringing in more tourists, such as seeing trash picked up and toilets cleaned. 

The Runway Group could use the re-designation as a marketing tool to increase economic development, Gordon said. Cupp said it always has been about economic development as well as community input and feedback. 

Sen. Bryan King, R-Green Forest, who represents District 28, questioned the Runway Group’s transparency. “When everyone wants to take something, they’re not going to tell you,” King said. 

King told the crowd the local people should have been informed from the beginning. “I know this train had been rolling down the tracks,” he said.

Jared Phillips, a writer, farmer and historian, who teaches at the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, said he is tired of seeing land values triple. 

“When do we as people from the hills get to sit at the table and have a say?” he asked “This is our home and we don’t get asked about it.”

Phillips said with the developments in the area, he feels less welcome. He feels the Waltons are “telling us regular folks in the Ozarks we’re in the way of what rich folks want to do.”

He also questioned why some elected officials chose not to attend the town hall, asking where they were and what could be more important. “Junior high football is almost over,” he said. 

Poll Results 

In September, in an effort to gauge public opinion, the Runway Group said it hired Selzer & Co., who polled 412 voters in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton and Searcy counties about a change in land designation and produced a flyer with the results.

Jasper native Wendy Finn, who lives on a farm that has been in her family for 123 years, went over results from the survey, poking holes in results, stating that the survey was flawed, and asserting it was confusing and not comprehensive. 

Finn’s slide presentation viewed on large screens in the auditorium started with “technical difficulties,” that she “didn’t anticipate but we’re going to make this work as we do in Newton County,” which has limited broadband accessibility. 

“They drew conclusions and put them on so-called, ‘fact sheets,’” Finn said of the survey.

She said the poll was confusing because people polled were left thinking, “What’s happening,” or “My head is spinning.” 

Speakers also mocked the selection of those polled. King said people in attendance were a better representation of how people feel about the proposal rather than the Runway poll and stated the people who actually live in the watershed should have been polled. 

Tourism 

Langdon pointed out that the survey and information from Runway showed a potential increase in tourism from 1.5 million to 2.4 million, a 60% increase, which she said, “will change our landscape.”

Re-designating land will bring in more tourists increasing taxes and adding to economic growth in the area, according to those in favor of re-designation. 

“You’re looking at positive economic impact, prolonging and protecting the national park, the national river, protecting what brings people here, so hunting, fishing, floating, all that. None of that changes. And that’s why it’s a national park preserve and not just a national park,” according to Austin Albers, president and owner of Buffalo Outdoor Center.

“So they’re seeing, not necessarily more river usage, but more people coming into the area, so more lodging, more restaurants, more purchases of fuel and using the services in the area,” he said in an earlier interview with The Record. 

“It’s bringing more positive infrastructure to one of our poorest areas in the state,” Albers said. 

The Buffalo National River saw a 6.5% increase in tourism during the Covid-19 pandemic.  “This area is no stranger to the tourism industry,” she said. 

Phillips said an increase in tourism makes land more expensive by increasing taxes and, “We have to leave.” 

He also said an influx of tourists makes working in the area harder. 

“Think of it if you’re trying to haul a trailer and have to get through a mess of tourists,” he said. “It’s getting to where you can’t work.”

Jack Stewart of the Audubon Society told The Record, “Sometimes we tend to love our special places to death.” He said people are fearful, “We’ll be overwhelmed with tourists and it will completely change the area.”

Preserve a way of life

Newton County resident Billy Bell, who worked as a resource protection ranger on the river for 13 years and for 20 years in resource management and protection, drew a standing ovation after he spoke. 

“I am not for the re-designation of the Buffalo National River,” Bell emphasized and then paused.  “Give me one minute. I’m very passionate about this at the moment,” he said, becoming emotional. 

Bell drew a correlation regarding the song, “Rich Men North of Richmond,” and said in the current situation the lyrics could be, “Rich Men Not From Here.”

Bell said, “Rich men not from here brought the Buffalo National River into being using the battle cry, ‘Save the Buffalo River.’

“Rich men not from here recently decided what kind of farming we should or should not be able to do on our own land, also using the battle cry, ‘Save The Buffalo.’

“And today it appears rich men not from here are pushing to change our way of life once again.”

The crowd cheered and applauded when Bell said rich men were using the battle cry of “Save the Buffalo River” to spin public opinion and exploit the river “for their own personal gain.”

President of Newton County Farm Bureau Jack Boles also drew a groundswell of applause when he said his organization “opposes any name change to the Buffalo National River or expansion or re-designation.” 

Going Forward 

Stewart, along with Watkins, stressed the need for a plan of the area. Watkins said he hoped the justices of peace would work together to come up with a plan for management of the area’s growth. 

“Without an agreed upon vision, it will be easy for some group to divide us and conquer,” Stewart said. 

Attorney Brinkley Cook-Campbell, who grew up in Mt. Judea, said, “We have a pretty wonderful status quo going on,” that isn’t broken and doesn’t need to be fixed.

He then read a letter and encouraged others to get a copy to send to their representatives, senators and other elected officials.

Some parts of the letter read, “We want to raise our grandchildren to appreciate this area. We want to teach them to bottle feed a calf on the family farm. We want to take them floating on the Buffalo. We want them to be able to hunt and fish, to hike and to rock climb, and above all, we want them to love their fellow people and respect nature.

“‘National Park’ or ‘National Park Preserve’ status would mean an end to our way of life,” the letter said.

Democrat Gazette

State proposes Buffalo River area trail study

by Bill Bowden 

The Arkansas Office of Outdoor Recreation proposed on Tuesday that about $70,000 in state grant money go to communities in the vicinity of the Buffalo National River to hire a firm to do a master plan of trail connectivity.

But the Buffalo River Conservation Committee, which is under the state Department of Agriculture, won't be providing a grant to fund the plan -- at least not this year.

Instead, the committee voted Tuesday to give the remaining $70,000 it has available for year-end grants to H2Ozarks of Kimberling City, Mo., to implement conservation practices in the sub-watershed of Mill Creek, a tributary of the Buffalo River.

Katherine Andrews, director of the Office of Outdoor Recreation, pitched the trail plan via Zoom on Tuesday to the committee, which was meeting in Marshall.

"This project proposal that was put forth by our department; we would like to propose that the BRCC grant the remaining funds to communities surrounding the Buffalo National River corridor to be used to hire a third-party firm to conduct a recreation master plan of existing trail connectivity," Andrews said.

The Office of Outdoor Recreation would assist the third-party firm, she said. The study would look at trails surrounding, but not within, the Buffalo National River boundary.

"We hope that this firm could develop an inventory of recreational assets in the area and a review of existing trails and infrastructure for a comprehensive, community-led plan for connectivity," Andrews said.

A woman at the meeting asked if the Natural State Initiative was behind the proposal, and Andrews said it was not.

She said the proposal came from within the Arkansas Department of Parks, Heritage and Tourism, of which the Office of Outdoor Recreation is a part.

Gov. Sarah Huckabee formed the Natural State Initiative through an executive order in January and appointed her husband, Bryan Sanders, to serve as chairman of the Natural State Initiative Advisory Council, which provides advice to the governor regarding the promotion of outdoor recreation and the outdoor economy in Arkansas.

Also on the Advisory Council is Tom Walton, a grandson of Walmart founder Sam Walton and co-founder of Runway Group of Bentonville, which has floated the idea of having the Buffalo National River re-designated as a national park and preserve.

The re-designation idea, which in theory would bring more visitors to the area, has been opposed by many area residents who say they should have been consulted before Runway Group met with U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., about it over a year ago.

A public townhall-style meeting on the issue drew a crowd of about 1,200 in the Jasper school cafeteria on Thursday, with those who spoke being very much opposed to the national park re-designation. They were concerned about overcrowding, river access, private property rights and a change to "our way of life."

Runway Group didn't send a representative to the meeting in Jasper. Runway promotes trails and has worked to help make Bentonville a destination for mountain bikers.

After Andrews presented her proposal on Tuesday, Andy McCutcheon of St. Joe said that a couple of years ago, it might have been a good idea, but "I'm just going to go ahead and kick the elephant in the room."

"There's a certain other proposal, idea or suggestion that is going on that has a lot of people in this area very hostile right now, very alert, very on edge," he said, referring to the Buffalo National River re-designation idea.

Because of that, McCutcheon said, the proposal Andrews made Tuesday may face stiff opposition.

"I think if you go into these communities right now with the tensions the way they are, this will not be received very well," said McCutcheon. "Anything with 'tourism' attached to it right now is going to be very scrutinized."

McCutcheon said he's been on Buffalo River Conservation Committee subcommittees and he's been a vocal landowner and advocate.

The committee was formed by former Gov. Asa Hutchinson in 2019 after the state agreed to pay $6.2 million to buy out C&H Hog Farms, the subject of years-long environmental concerns on Big Creek, about 6.6 miles from where it flows into the Buffalo River.

"I think we've made good inroads," said McCutcheon. "Over the last couple of months, we've got some black eyes over something we've had nothing to do with. And I spoke out. I've tried to mitigate that and say BRCC had nothing to do with it, we didn't even know it was coming. But there's a lot of people who still harbor some feelings that we did."

The committee's water quality studies will still be well received, said McCutcheon.

Darryl Treat, executive director of the Searcy County Chamber of Commerce, said the trail plan sounded like a good idea, but he has concerns.

"We have a fabulous trail that runs from southwestern Searcy County, the Ozark Highlands Trail, all the way to Wollum on the Buffalo River, picks up the Buffalo River Trail, goes all the way down the south side of the river to Dillards Ferry," he said.

"It's all connected. ... And then, apart from that main trail, which is under the umbrella of the Ozark Highlands Trail, the other trails that we have are few and far between."

They'll cut the ribbon on a new trail on Monday, said Treat.

"But these trails, there's really not a lot of opportunity to connect with other trails because they are isolated within a lot of private land," he said. "And so I don't really know how to connect them."

Treat said Searcy County also has horseback riding trails and cycling trails, which are primarily on roads but are basically connected.

"One thing I fear is that if a master plan is developed, then the state will use that master plan against us in the future," he said.

"And that's one thing I'm just a little concerned about. I would hope that the people in each of the individual counties would continue to have the greatest oversight on how they want to see the future of tourism in their county and not be pushed in a certain direction based on a master plan."

A third proposal for the remaining grant funding was from the U.S. Geological Survey to do a "seepage study," looking primarily at the interaction of surface water and groundwater.

KUAF Radio

Bass Pro slowly carves out a private nature preserve on former Dogpatch USA grounds

KUAF Radio - Listen here

Widespread opposition to efforts to re-designate the Buffalo National River emerges

By Jacqueline Froelich

Published October 30, 2023 at 2:20 PM CDT

LISTEN • 6:40

Matthew Moore: I’m here with Jacqueline Froelich, Ozarks at Large senior news producer, to discuss a town hall meeting held Thursday in Jasper in Newton County about a controversial effort to expand the Buffalo National River into a national park preserve. As you’ve reported, the Walton-backed Runway Group in Bentonville has been leading this effort. They’ve met with state and federal officials – but not the public. So how many turned out for the town hall meeting and what was the tone?

Jacqueline Froelich: I spoke with Wendy Finn, a co-organizer of the town hall, who along with Misty Langdon — a seventh generation Newton County farmer — have formed a group to thwart re-designating the river. Finn said 1,185 showed up for the town hall in person, with 1,900 attending virtually. The event was calm, she added, but attendees were upset and confused about how changing the park could impact their lives.

“People were angry at the idea of possibly losing land," Finn said. "I think most people oppose a designation change to the Buffalo National River.”

MM: The meeting featured a panel comprised of natives, several farmers, an attorney, a state senator, an Arkansas Farm Bureau official, an environmentalist and a scholar. All of them oppose a park preserve? 

JF: Yes. The audio stream quality is not the best, but this is Newton County native Billy Bell. 

“I have spent my entire life playing on or in the Buffalo National River or its tributaries," Bell said. "I am not for re-designation for the Buffalo National River.”

JF: Reciting verse, Bell told the crowd that “rich men not from here are pushing to change a way of life.” He was referring to Runway Group LLC, based in Bentonville. The well-regarded private company, operated by Walmart heirs Tom and Steuart Walton, invest in real estate, businesses, outdoor recreation, and conservation. Runway’s interest in re-designating the Buffalo River came to light in September when the Waltons commissioned a survey, later posting results online as “The Coalition for Buffalo River National Park Preserve.” The five-county survey shows a majority would support a park preserve. But I’ve been told the survey failed to include an adequate number of residents in Newton County, which lies in the heart of Buffalo River watershed.

MM: Why is Runway Group involved in this?

JF: Runway’s spokesperson, J.T. Geren in an email to Ozarks at Large wrote that changing the national river to a national park preserve will provide benefits to surrounding communities and help with needed infrastructure improvement to support an ever-growing number of tourists. Data show that last year, the Buffalo National River attracted 1.3 million visitors who spent nearly $65 million dollars on food, accommodations and outfitters.

MM: Re-designating a national river will require an act of Congress. You queried Arkansas Governor Sarah Sanders about her role in this, and were told Sanders had spoken with U.S. Congressman Bruce Westerman, R-AR. The watershed is located in his district. When she took office, Sanders vowed to make Arkansas a top recreation destination, signing an executive order establishing the Natural State Advisory Council, appointing her husband Bryan Sanders as chair?

JF: Yes. But the thing is, key stakeholders including staff with the Buffalo River National Park Service and founder of the apex environmental group Buffalo River Watershed Alliance were excluded from this process. We spoke with Alliance president Gordon Watkins, after the town hall.

"I think it was unfortunate the way they chose to proceed with this project," Watkins said, "and that began at the top with Congressman Westerman's office from what we can tell back in July of 2022.”

JF: Which was startling to hear, that this has been in motion for well over a year. Watkins said that the best way to discuss major projects like this is to talk directly to the people and that means starting from the bottom, not at the top. He did say Runway Group agreed to meet with him virtually, the day before the town hall gathering. Nothing new was revealed, he said. But he was told the company is backing off leading what it's described as “an economic development project.” It’s unclear who will take over and what’s next. Congressman Westerman is reportedly planning his own town hall meeting. 

MM:  But to better understand the consequence of a national park preserve, you spoke with Allan Franco, a lawyer who researches rural land use regulation who's familiar with Runway's effort?

JF: Yes, Allan Franco told me it will be up to Congress to legislate what activities will be allowed on the preserve within a declared Buffalo River National Park boundary. But he also commented on the economic interests pushing for this change.

“Well we know that they're going to be interested in making a profit off the Buffalo National River," Franco said. "One way that they could do that is through tourism and vacation rentals. Right now the current legislation doesn't expressly allow for vacation rentals. Other national preserve designations in more recent years have specifically allowed for vacation rentals within the park boundary.”

JF: I was surprised to hear this as well. But it makes sense given several Arkansas lawmakers have sponsored legislation to nullify county and municipal codes to control short-term rental sprawl -- which has been shown to vastly reduce affordable residential housing. Franco also said if a national park preserve facility is approved by Congress, resulting in an expanded footprint, it's unlikely that private property — based on recent federal trends — would be taken thru eminent domain condemnation. Instead he says property would be acquired through purchase. As for what's called consumptive activities such as hunting, animal grazing, industrial agriculture, minerals and fuels extraction on a re-designated Buffalo National River Park Preserve? All of it is allowed, but again, the details will be up to Congress to decide.

MM: You also asked Runway Group if the company has donated support to the Buffalo National River Foundation to improve things like trails and facilities. What was the response?

JF: No comment. But a spokesperson did email me a link to a five-year old National Park Service study citing myriad problems within the Buffalo National River park, for example overcrowding, insufficient river access, inadequate facilities and water quality issues. 

MM: The Buffalo River was declared our nations very first national river in 1972, after efforts to impound the stream for hydroelectricity were defeated. We’ll continue to follow this story. 

Update: Runway Group's coalition page appears to have been removed, but the company continues to post news regarding it's efforts to re-designate the Buffalo River park.

Arkansas Advocate

Concern over possible Buffalo National River redesignation draws huge crowd to small Arkansas town

Most speakers voice fears of what a national park preserve would do to area already stressed by visitors

BY: JORDAN P. HICKEY - OCTOBER 27, 2023 3:56 PM

JASPER — A sign on the way into this Newton County town states its population is 547.

On Thursday evening, more than twice that number, upwards of 1,185 people, squeezed into the cafeteria at the local high school. The original 400 chairs had been supplemented by another 273 that students toted in from every classroom on campus — even then, the crowd spread along the walls of the gym, into the vestibule and hallways, past vending machines and photos of past graduates.

Those numbers did not include the 500 people watching on the library’s Zoom livestream (their subscription caps streams at 500), or the more than 1,400 folks who tuned in via Facebook Live.

“I was expecting this to be 75 people at Carroll Electric, so you’ll have to bear with me here,” event organizer Misty Langdon said from the crowded dais shortly after 6 p.m., apologizing that they didn’t have the ability to broadcast into the rest of the school.

The only reason so many people would turn out on a Thursday night? The Buffalo River.

For more than three weeks, news stories and rumors had stirred concerns and lingering distrust among residents who live in the towns and communities along the Buffalo — that once again wealthy outsiders were trying to alter the river’s protected status as the nation’s first National River.

Thursday night, that concern and distrust came to a head as ten different speakers — including Sen. Bryan King, R-Green Forest, and people from organizations ranging from the National Audubon Society to the local chapter of the Farm Bureau — voiced wariness and opposition to a nascent proposal to re-designate the federal lands along the Buffalo National River, just over 94,000 acres today, as a national park preserve.

The difference is a significant one: a national river designation preserves free-flowing streams, protects the waterway from industrial uses, and allows for hiking, canoeing and hunting. A national park preserve loosens those restrictions, opens the door for potential mineral extraction, and allows management to be transferred to local or state control.

“I see history repeating itself there,” Langdon said in an interview the day before the meeting, noting parallels between the 1970s and today. “These are wealthy people that do not live here and do not know the culture here. And yet they are proposing to make sweeping changes to our landscape. And I think that frightens the people that live in the community.”

‘Shouldn’t we have a meeting?’

Langdon — a seventh-generation resident of nearby Steel Creek whose “cultural heritage and historical preservation group” the Remnants Project organized the evening — had spent the past few days organizing the event. But the real work had started roughly two weeks before, when rumors about a phone survey were circulating in the community.

As reported by The Madison County Record on Oct. 4, Iowa-based Selzer & Company, which was later linked to Walton-run Runway Group LLC, polled 412 voters in Baxter, Madison, Marion, Newton and Searcy counties between Sept. 11-13 about their thoughts concerning the proposed re-designation.

Wendy Finn, one of the first speakers of the evening, took a close look at the survey and the fact sheets that re-designation proponents had developed from those results, flagging some problematic language and omissions.

For example, Finn said, 64 percent of those surveyed were in favor of designating the Buffalo River as a National Park and Preserve, but the surveyors didn’t define what those terms meant. Finn also noted that nearly half of the survey respondents (43%) had been from Baxter County, which contains the least amount of Buffalo River watershed of the counties surveyed (2.5%). Newton County, on the other hand, which has 46% of the Buffalo River watershed, made up only 7% percent of those surveyed, or 29 people.

After getting wind of the survey, Langdon had reached out to some local county elected officials, asking them, “Shouldn’t we have a meeting to get to the bottom of this?” Nothing had materialized. She then reached out to the Runway Group on Oct. 11 and asked if they’d be interested in participating in a town hall style meeting on Oct. 26. Absolutely, was the answer.

She’d hoped to bring them in to answer some questions about the survey — and why there had even been a survey, “because nobody had really been able to understand the ‘why’ behind it.”

Adding to the uncertainty was another piece of information first reported by The Madison County Record in its Oct. 4 story — that Walton Enterprises-owned Kings Creek LLC had purchased land near Kingston, accumulating “more than 6,000 contiguous acres, according to records from the Madison County Assessor’s Office, making it one of the largest landowners in Madison County.”

To this, Langdon said: “I’m not fearing eminent domain, I’m fearing being taxed out of my home. You know, I hear people saying, ‘how am I going to pay my taxes, I can barely pay my taxes now.’ And these are people that are older and on a fixed income.”

‘Opportunity for transparency’

After opening Thursday’s meeting and explaining the reason for holding it, Langdon addressed the lack of an elephant in the room: The no-show from the Runway Group. Although Runway had originally agreed to attend, they pulled out as the winds of public opinion shifted around the meeting and the projected attendance snowballed.

Runway’s presence “would have provided an opportunity for transparency and an opportunity to meet the community that they have been researching,” Langdon told the crowd. “I did receive a call this morning from Runway wishing us well and asking me to make a comment on their behalf. However, I feel that any statement would be better coming from their team.”

On the flier that provided the event schedule, there was a list of those who had also “declined or not responded”: Johnny Morris; National (sic) State Advisory Council; Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders; 1st Gentleman Bryan Sanders; National Parks Service.

“I think that whenever we’re looking at this, we need to be transparent,” said King, the lawmaker who’s been most vocal about needing to involve the local community in decision-making. “That’s just not flat happening right now.”

‘Too many people and an expensive price tag’

Over the course of an hour and a half, 10 different speakers stood and took their place at the microphone.

Although each person approached the issue at hand through their own lens, whether that was agriculture, recreation, politics, history, preservation, and so forth, they all echoed the same sentiment that had drawn such large crowds to the room that evening — that they were not about to be left out of a conversation that would so directly affect their lives. (Gordon Watkins, who spoke on behalf of the Buffalo River Watershed Alliance, summed this up when he said, “Someone said that if you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re on the menu.”)

Langdon, whose family has owned Steel Creek Cabins since 2004, addressed the effects of past increased tourism, showing photographs of roads lined with cars and the river log-jammed with kayaks. This, Langdon explained, is what a 6.5% percent increase in tourism looked like — which is what the area had experienced during the COVID years — before noting that the Runway Group had projected a 60% increase.

One of the most crowd-rousing speeches of the night came from Billy Bell, whose bio simply stated, “Billy Bell is a Newton County resident.”

“The propaganda that I have seen in the watershed map tells us that these rich men are going to protect our rights to hunt and fish — but what I see is a bait and switch operation,” Bell said to whistles, claps, and a “that’s right.” “The questions I have are: One, who are they protecting us from? Two, do we actually need protection? And three, is telling us that we need protection a scare tactic?”

Bell said he’d worked 20 years in resource management and protection for the Buffalo River and U.S. Forest Service, then listed a series of protected activities on the river, including different veins of fishing and hunting — “deer, bear, elk, turkey, squirrel, squirrel with a dog, rabbit, rabbit with a dog, coon, coon with a dog — ending each series with the statement “No permit required.” At the end of his speech, Bell was given the night’s only full standing ovation.

The last speaker of the night, attorney Brinkley Cook-Campell, a native of Mount Judea, read a two-page open letter that was addressed to U.S. Reps. Bruce Westerman, Rick Crawford, Steve Womack and French Hill; U.S. Sens. John Boozman and Tom Cotton; Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders “and all Arkansas elected officials.”

Runway Group representatives approached Westerman about designating the federal lands surrounding the Buffalo as a park preserve in July 2022, The Madison County Record reported this week.

Cook-Campbell’s letter read in part:

“As time passes, the Buffalo River will likely succumb to what ruins all natural wonders — too many people and an expensive price tag. Let’s not hasten that result by changing the river’s designation. Our community should be left as it is, beautiful, pristine and wild. Because when it changes — when the visitor centers and hotels come, when the hay field becomes a parking lot, and the gravel bar around the bend becomes a plaza of restrooms — there will be no going back. The locals will see their way of life lost forever.”

After the meeting, Langdon said that seeing such varied and often diametrically opposed interests sharing a stage felt like being in “The Twilight Zone”: “These are the two most polarized groups in our community that have come together to say this will not benefit our community or the river in any way.”

She went on to say that she was so proud of her community, but that this was likely far from the last time that the community would need to draw together. Although the Runway Group had been reported as saying they planned to retract the plans, skepticism remained strong. One of the prevailing notions during the meeting had been the need for a unified vision — and as Langdon said the day before, they needed to have that vision heard well before legislation was crafted.

“One thing that we learned is once it starts the process of going through legislation, we have very little input in how that bill is written.”

In the meantime, however, as she looked over the 673 chairs being pulled into stacks and the diminishing clusters of conversations, she seemed pleased with the event — and said she was also looking forward to some well-deserved rest.

“We have an off-the-grid cabin,” Langdon said. “I plan on being there for about the next three days with no cell service.”

 

Arkansas Times

Over 1,100 attend Jasper town hall on Buffalo National River’s future

NEWS

BY

 Debra Hale-Shelton  

ON 

October 27, 2023

Jasper, a tiny Ozarks town in Newton County, is home to only about 525 residents. But Thursday night, it hosted a town hall attended by 1,185 people.

If you think that’s a lot, there were another 500 watching the meeting on Zoom and 1,400 on Facebook live, according to the town hall’s organizer, the Remnants Project, an Ozarks-based preservation group.

The topic bringing so many people together was the future of the Buffalo National River, which a Walton-founded company, Runway Group LLC, wants to turn into a national park preserve.

That’s an idea many locals near the nation’s first national river don’t like. But they even more dislike the idea of outsiders pushing the proposal without talking with residents up front.

Reports early this week were that Runway, an investment business founded by two third-generation Walton brothers, was backing off the idea. But in a statement on its website Wednesday, Runway still seemed enamored with its idea.

“A designation change for the Buffalo National River is not our decision to make, but we believe it’s an idea worth exploring,” Runway said.

The Remnants Project invited Runway to the town hall, but Runway did not attend. Runway’s founders are Steuart Walton and Tom Walton, grandsons of Walmart founder Sam Walton.

Runway also confirmed that it approached U.S. Rep. Bruce Westerman in July 2022 to discuss the possibility of redesignating the river to a national park preserve — a move that would require congressional approval.

“We wanted to get the congressman’s thoughts, first because part of the BNR is within his district, and because he holds a position on the Natural Resources Committee,” Runway said. “Congressman Westerman made it clear to us that the idea needed support from various groups, state and local officials and the local community.”

Debra Hale-Shelton

Debra Hale-Shelton is a reporter for the Arkansas Times. She has previously worked for The Associated Press and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.